There is no where else to post this and I'll leave it to the moderators to decide whether this is too far astray. By way of disclaimer I now have a rather small stake in Bitcoin and Dogecoin as I built a machine to mine them starting at the New Year, mining rewards are in part a function of how many people are mining so boy is it a risk to mention that to this group
The following link is the best synopsis of the pro bitcoin position I have read, it was written by Marc Andresson who invented the Netscape browser maybe 15 years ago, which despite a few new bells and whistles looks pretty much the same as the browser I use now.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/01/...tcoin-matters/
I will add my two bits to this article about things unsaid. 1) Bitcoin is a superior form of money, it does not like the dollar come into existence as a note of debt upon which "interest" must be paid but as a credit, If, like the dollar (errr, federal reserve note) bringing something into existence from nothing, which people have to pay interest on to use does not meet the definition of usury I don't know what does. Bitcoin also allows for much more rapid transactions with almost no transaction fees. 2) Unlike the PC or internet which Mr Andressen mentions the bitcoin protocol presents an obvious threat to established monied interests. That pretty much sums it up in my mind, it's better and it is obviously threatening.
When I first read on this maybe a year ago I said that has to be stomped out, it just can't be. If I had been a bit more idealistic and a bit less cynical I would be a lot more wealthy today, It was when the Chinese central bank declared a couple months ago that Chinese banks could not exchange bitcoin for Chinese yuan and bitcoin only dropped 50 percent that I said I have to get involved with this and now. China is the second largest economy and at the time had the largest bitcoin -> national currency exchange in the world, I really think this was intended to be the deathknell, instead bitcoin has bounced back more than half way from what it lost at the announcement. This is funny, because if the banks say, we won't play and everyone says, fine FU, what do they do to keep the royal scam going. So I would guess right now they are looking for weaknesses in the technology, talking the idea down and/or looking for ways to co-opt it. As it becomes more and more widespread, they could be in the position to use a line from a general in an obscure Monty Python skit of saying "OK, surround everyone, with everything we've got." It still all strikes me as very much a longshot but man is it something needed. There are many alternate currencies (and may the best currency win), these are the ones worth mining with homebuilt computers. Dogecoin (nicest, most witty community on the Reddit forums) just sponsored the Jamaican bobsled team to the Olympics in two days of fundraising. Yes I own a few hundred dollars worth of Doge, but these young pups just keep deciding to just have fun and do good with Doge, it is honestly heartwarming and so I'll close with their mantra, Doge coin TO THE MOON!!!
The following link is the best synopsis of the pro bitcoin position I have read, it was written by Marc Andresson who invented the Netscape browser maybe 15 years ago, which despite a few new bells and whistles looks pretty much the same as the browser I use now.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/01/...tcoin-matters/
I will add my two bits to this article about things unsaid. 1) Bitcoin is a superior form of money, it does not like the dollar come into existence as a note of debt upon which "interest" must be paid but as a credit, If, like the dollar (errr, federal reserve note) bringing something into existence from nothing, which people have to pay interest on to use does not meet the definition of usury I don't know what does. Bitcoin also allows for much more rapid transactions with almost no transaction fees. 2) Unlike the PC or internet which Mr Andressen mentions the bitcoin protocol presents an obvious threat to established monied interests. That pretty much sums it up in my mind, it's better and it is obviously threatening.
When I first read on this maybe a year ago I said that has to be stomped out, it just can't be. If I had been a bit more idealistic and a bit less cynical I would be a lot more wealthy today, It was when the Chinese central bank declared a couple months ago that Chinese banks could not exchange bitcoin for Chinese yuan and bitcoin only dropped 50 percent that I said I have to get involved with this and now. China is the second largest economy and at the time had the largest bitcoin -> national currency exchange in the world, I really think this was intended to be the deathknell, instead bitcoin has bounced back more than half way from what it lost at the announcement. This is funny, because if the banks say, we won't play and everyone says, fine FU, what do they do to keep the royal scam going. So I would guess right now they are looking for weaknesses in the technology, talking the idea down and/or looking for ways to co-opt it. As it becomes more and more widespread, they could be in the position to use a line from a general in an obscure Monty Python skit of saying "OK, surround everyone, with everything we've got." It still all strikes me as very much a longshot but man is it something needed. There are many alternate currencies (and may the best currency win), these are the ones worth mining with homebuilt computers. Dogecoin (nicest, most witty community on the Reddit forums) just sponsored the Jamaican bobsled team to the Olympics in two days of fundraising. Yes I own a few hundred dollars worth of Doge, but these young pups just keep deciding to just have fun and do good with Doge, it is honestly heartwarming and so I'll close with their mantra, Doge coin TO THE MOON!!!
Comment