Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dissecting Erfinder’s comments

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bigmotherwhale
    replied
    Originally posted by erfinder View Post
    Look at that link Tom C linked you to, look at the flux exiting and entering the magnet!!! This is NOT what I am saying! What did I say guys? Does this fit what I said about looking between the turns???? NO! THE POLES ARE CONSTRUCTS!!! THEY ARE NOT REAL! MAGNETISM MOVES AROUND THE WIRE IN CIRCLES THIS MEANS WE ARE LOOKING IN THE WRONG LOCATION FOR THE "MAGNETIC POLE". THE POLE YOU ALL ARE PREOCCUPIED WITH IS NOT MAGNETIC......IT'S DIELECTRIC!!!!!! Nature is pulling a fast one on us folks. I have been looking at this stuff for some time now and can and have proven all of the things I am saying to myself. Thinking what you want, at this stage drives you further and further away from where we need to be.


    Regards

    are you talking about the cause and effect, like we are in a domain of effect and cannot see the underlying cause?
    'THE POLE YOU ALL ARE PREOCCUPIED WITH IS NOT MAGNETIC......IT'S DIELECTRIC!!!'
    as far as i comprehend this it is the result of desire to reach equilibrium, as they are two oposing ways it never can, like ying and yang (?)

    The source of the magnet being in the 'bloch wall'?

    Leave a comment:


  • guyzzemf
    replied
    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/uf...rchapter4b.htmClick image for larger version

Name:	88.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	11.2 KB
ID:	46438

    Leave a comment:


  • Lman
    replied
    Originally posted by bob smith View Post
    Maybe I'm off-base, but standing back and thinking about things, the following set of linked questions arise for me:

    If successive coils on the stator are wound in opposite directions and joined in series, does this provide a means for harnessing the CEMF arising as each magnet on the rotor passes by a coil?
    If this is the case, then are successive pairs of coils going to act like series-wound bifilar coils?
    And if so, will the interplay between rotor magnets and the entire array of coils acting in series-wound bifilar fashion naturally reach its own resonant point (with resultant lowered impedance) so that in effect, the whole array of coils, joined in series provides a continuous path for unidirectional flux?
    Would the dynamics of series-wound-bifilar coils apply therefore to the entire circular array of coils wired in series? That is, would we have...
    - decreased current due to cancellation of magnetic fields?
    - but increased capacitance between windings?
    - increased voltage output?
    - and if all the windings were in series, would the entire set of windings behave as a shorted bifilar coil in resonance, with lowered impedance?
    If this were the case, would the whole system, in a sense, hum at its own resonant frequency (and lowered impedance) and with the bifilar-like configuration, be open to the dielectric ambient medium?

    Bob
    Bob,

    I am thinking about the following :
    The coils in series are charged (High Impedance) and are discharged in the coils in parallel (Low Impedance). L-C. The series-parallel connection.
    If we short the induced I think we can ring that L-C.

    P.S. And how this relates to the "magnetic pole".

    Regards
    Lman
    Last edited by Lman; 08-20-2014, 12:15 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lman
    replied
    Huh, that is a BIG A-HAA moment.

    I admit something crossed my mind but I would not have guessed that it even though it was hinted and said in a way. And not once.

    A huge lesson and a game changer.

    Thank you erfinder. Thank you !!!

    Regards
    Lman

    Leave a comment:


  • erfinder
    replied
    Look at that link Tom C linked you to, look at the flux exiting and entering the magnet!!! This is NOT what I am saying! What did I say guys? Does this fit what I said about looking between the turns???? NO! THE POLES ARE CONSTRUCTS!!! THEY ARE NOT REAL! MAGNETISM MOVES AROUND THE WIRE IN CIRCLES THIS MEANS WE ARE LOOKING IN THE WRONG LOCATION FOR THE "MAGNETIC POLE". THE POLE YOU ALL ARE PREOCCUPIED WITH IS NOT MAGNETIC......IT'S DIELECTRIC!!!!!! Nature is pulling a fast one on us folks. I have been looking at this stuff for some time now and can and have proven all of the things I am saying to myself. Thinking what you want, at this stage drives you further and further away from where we need to be.


    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Lman
    replied
    Well,

    Seems the tank circuit with two inductors was new thing to me only.


    bigmotherwhale,


    This is one of the things erfinder wanted us to see and he said it :


    Originally posted by erfinder View Post
    Although attraction mode is superior to repulsion mode, the separation of the two isn't what we ultimately want, we want both modes. We want to use both sides of the magnet, and here I'm not so much talking about the poles, in this particular instance, I am talking about the corner spins of the magnet. The north pole of the magnet contains multiple orders of spin, however, only two are of immediate interest. Flux leaves the north pole in a left handed spiral, and a right handed spiral. Flux leaves the south pole in a left handed spiral and a right handed spiral. H. Johnson shows you this in his work, we were re-introduced to his work by JB. It's my opinion that H. Johnson's work applies to JB's work. JB suppresses one of the corner spins in a manner similar to how H. Johnson did, turning the SG into a kind of magnetic gate, when operated in attraction mode. Had I been preoccupied with doing what I am told, this connection would not have been made! After studying this for a while, when you start looking at the other technologies, specifically the window and zero force typologies, it becomes clear that once again we are dealing with rotor to coil corner spin interactions. At this point it hits you, how is this any different from what we already experience in conventional designs which have been with us for over the last 100 years. The answer shocked me, fundamentally there is no difference!
    Read posts 112 and 111 as well.

    I think Bob was the most focused of all of us.


    I say Thank you to Tom C for making it more visual posting that link !


    Regards
    Lman
    Last edited by Lman; 08-19-2014, 04:29 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigmotherwhale
    replied
    tom C posted this http://wmsn.net/Adams%20Motor%20Theory.htm
    it shows ALOT,

    the magnetic vortex inside the magnet, the voltage and frequency, the two areas on the magnet of greatest attraction, demagnetization as a potential over unity concept, it also solves the problem of how the capactor is charged in the primary
    brilliant

    Leave a comment:


  • bigmotherwhale
    replied
    Originally posted by Patrikas View Post
    BMW
    I couldnt agree more .....i wish u guys well with your endeavour here on this thread ......and you too Radiant with what you are doing ......working in unity can bring many good things into the light ... been following this thread and the windmill thread right from the start ....unfortunately being too new to electronics and this field i cannot offer anything except good wishes ......it all "Feels " great to me stay well
    Best wishings to you too patrikas

    Leave a comment:


  • bigmotherwhale
    replied
    Originally posted by bob smith View Post
    there is more specific info on steve's build on this thread. Check out this post by kiril: http://www.energyscienceforum.com/sh...ll=1#post14754 the pages before it and after it, as well as kiril's youtube channel have further info.
    Bob
    thankyou bob

    Leave a comment:


  • bob smith
    replied
    Originally posted by bigmotherwhale View Post
    Bob i liked what you said about the entire array of coils connected in series, what about parallel? seems like a good idea to increase H, we are missing vital info about coil connection we can only guess. not sure about the bifiler arangement at all definately no lizt from what i have read about mag amps on the ferris wheel thread that tom posted.
    BMW,
    Just go to what Erfinder said, and read thru the posts around the one I've linked in the above message (http://www.energyscienceforum.com/sh...ll=1#post14754). This particular post is the start of what seems to be a successful build. Read on from there (and backward thru quotes from Erfinder) and you'll see further pieces of the puzzle, concepts.
    Bob
    Last edited by bob smith; 08-19-2014, 07:00 AM. Reason: completing msg

    Leave a comment:


  • bob smith
    replied
    There is more specific info on Steve's build on this thread. Check out this post by Kiril: http://www.energyscienceforum.com/sh...ll=1#post14754 The pages before it and after it, as well as Kiril's youtube channel have further info.
    Bob

    Leave a comment:


  • OrthoParameter
    replied
    Originally posted by Radiantnrg View Post
    I was just mowing the lawn and thinking Steve has created a brick wall and every one is smashing their heads into it. The wall is just an allusion, and Steve has you under his spell. You will go nowhere until you break out of it. I myself got rid of all of his comments and will not read anything by him again.
    More nonsensical Steve bashing. I don't see a single person on this thread wanting to take a roll with you in the muck and mire. Perhaps if you spent this energy creating something positive.....?

    When you can take the pebble from his hand grasshopper.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrikas
    replied
    BMW
    I couldnt agree more .....i wish u guys well with your endeavour here on this thread ......and you too Radiant with what you are doing ......working in unity can bring many good things into the light ... been following this thread and the windmill thread right from the start ....unfortunately being too new to electronics and this field i cannot offer anything except good wishes ......it all "Feels " great to me stay well

    Leave a comment:


  • bigmotherwhale
    replied
    i was going in all directions becuse my mind wasnt made up. I have made up my mind as of yesterday. About certain things anyhow.
    please show us the quotes and your thinking

    Leave a comment:


  • Radiantnrg
    replied
    BMW, "Hey Al why not create your own thread!" You're right, I was about to do that anyway. I wanted another cad jpeg in may album before I did that. Last night after 4 hours an 88 kb file did not download. Good luck guys, I will start my own thread very soon and will do no more here.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X