Originally posted by bigmotherwhale
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dissecting Erfinder’s comments
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by bigmotherwhale View Postapparently not....
Regards
Comment
-
Originally posted by erfinder View PostI want you guys to come to the same or at the very least "similar" conclusions that I came to. It's not going to be easy for you, but you have to try, or you won't get anything out of any of this. I could show you how to build what I built but what higher purpose would it serve? We must begin to "SEE" what's there, that which has always been right in front of us.
I share my most basic view of what I see happening between the turns, this same information you can find on the net, and even test on your bench. This observation brings us to the following......
Repulsion = magnetic field
Attraction = dielectric field
In the end we are trying to establish the case for L and C. Where they are, why they are where they are. Good useful layman speculation, stuff we can use, stuff we can engineer.
Regards
Comment
-
As magnet wire is wrapped around a core it has the "potential" "capacity" puns intended, to be L and/or C. The resistance of the wire itself correlating to L and the dielectric of the enamel on the wire creates C.
The following is from Eric dollard
"dielectric lines of force push inward...the smaller the space bounded by the conducting structure the more energy that can be stored. This is the exact opposite of magnatism. With magnatism the units volumns of energy can be thought of as working in parallel but the units volumn of energy in association with dielectricity can be thought of as working in series," "voltage is to dieelectricity as current is to magnatism"
There is more, but I have no time to type. Aln
Comment
-
I think you guys are missing what I'm trying to say.....I don't care who said what or why. I am sharing what I think based on what I see on the bench, what you could verify if that was your thing. Look at whats going on between the turns, see the flux or the lack there of....come to your own conclusions. Hopefully your conclusions will be similar to mine, and you can "do" something practical with those conclusions..
Comment
-
Originally posted by erfinder View PostI think you guys are missing what I'm trying to say.....I don't care who said what or why. I am sharing what I think based on what I see on the bench, what you could verify if that was your thing. Look at whats going on between the turns, see the flux or the lack there of....come to your own conclusions. Hopefully your conclusions will be similar to mine, and you can "do" something practical with those conclusions..
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigmotherwhale View Posti think i get it correct me (again) if im wrong .... the coil acts as a capacitor or an inductor, under resonance, place the nodal points in the right relation to the magnet. and attach the source or drain at the respective points.
Resonance...I asked before...what is resonance? Which resonance are you referring to, I refer to several different forms of resonance, have experience with different forms of resonance in my machines. Like Tesla suggested, in my system, these different forms of resonance are synchronized.
There is a special relation between self induction and capacitance which is not being considered, but was suggested by Tesla. Make that connection! Why do we limit capacitance and inductance to the material, when we know they change with respect to time.
Regards
Comment
-
Originally posted by Radiantnrg View Posterfinder, How do we get your kits?
erfinder2@forgotten-genius.com
RegardsLast edited by erfinder; 08-13-2014, 02:30 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by erfinder View PostA coil has the capacity to function as either an inductor or a capacitor (ergo the name reactor was given to the inductor long ago by the wise). The capacitance of the coil isn't limited the so called parasitic capacitance. Capacity in Farads, if we believe what we read, is equal to A*s / V. Inductance in Henrys, if we believe what we read is V*s/A...fascinating. The formula leads us to conclude that the two are one?
Resonance...I asked before...what is resonance? Which resonance are you referring to, I refer to several different forms of resonance, have experience with different forms of resonance in my machines. Like Tesla suggested, in my system, these different forms of resonance are synchronized.
There is a special relation between self induction and capacitance which is not being considered, but was suggested by Tesla. Make that connection! Why do we limit capacitance and inductance to the material, when we know they change with respect to time.
Regards
i have seen a different resonance in a tuned via length of wire in a Stanley Meyer VIC (magnetic amp) which only happened at a specific voltage frequency i got it to occur at voltages around 60 volts only
i have no idea of the connection,
edit - it did change over timeLast edited by bigmotherwhale; 08-13-2014, 02:50 PM.
Comment
-
erfinder, Your email was rejected twice. If you email me then you can't get in trouble for giving out yours. I did get on your web site. inventer_al@yahoo.com
Comment
-
Comment