At 5:30
Then at the end:
I am inclined to believe that Erfinder's coil arrangement (and topology) is how he addresses the fluctuating induced EMF in each "revolution."
I add this quote from Erfinder as something to ponder regarding the generator section of his apparatus:
Getting back to Erfinder's Memory Lane video, I see, perhaps in a fuzzy way, that the coil topology is what's important, not the wave form per se.
Hope I'm not leading anyone astray.
Bob
Edit: If maximum induction occurs in a coil as a magnet approaches the coil's line of symmetry, how can we capitalize on it in order to produce what I would call the "Erfinder Effect"?
"If you understand this, you'll understand why I've adopted the topology that I've adopted."
"Don't stagnate on this. The future is behind the scope."
I add this quote from Erfinder as something to ponder regarding the generator section of his apparatus:
o The second type of machine is foreign to all but a few. This type of machine has no effect on the prime movers consumption, positive or negative. When this generator is loaded, impedance unspecific, a magnetic field is generated which at first glance appears to be cancelling itself as its being generated. The field isn't cancelling, think about it, that which we call neutralization or cancellation in coils we call attraction when dealing with permanent magnets. In this type of generator the coils are not dominated by their inductive property, the field is moving inward versus outward (look between the turns people....method to the madness). This kind of system is in my opinion capacitive, implosive, the magnetic field is moving in the direction of.....the space between spaces....what does the magnetic field meet when it arrives at its destination...the dielectric field maybe?
Hope I'm not leading anyone astray.
Bob
Edit: If maximum induction occurs in a coil as a magnet approaches the coil's line of symmetry, how can we capitalize on it in order to produce what I would call the "Erfinder Effect"?
Comment