Originally posted by Tom C
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Aln's edited notes from Erfinder's discussions.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by OrthoParameter View PostYeah... Enjoy your "struggling thread". A thread which has the singular purpose of piecing together and taking someone else's intellectual property.
Are you happy with your purchase? I understand if you can not talk of what you are learning in your school sessions with erfinder. Is it what you expected, do you want others to join your class? I am sure others would like to hear answers to these questions.
with no sarcasm. Aln
edit: was typing when above was written...Last edited by aln; 10-06-2014, 11:52 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Wing View PostErfinder also scavenged his info, without others he would have nothing...That is a fact... Perhaps you should take up your so called issues of piecing together others work with him first if you are that bent out of shape about others using others intellectual property.
You don't know me... So your opinion of me means nothing.
-Dave Wing
Take responsibility for your lack of knowledge.These others you refer to, whom without which I would have nothing, you have them too right, and what do you have to show for your relationship with them, with their works! That's not a question, its clear to all who read your posts what you have....nothing, and that is a fact! Sooo with that said....you go right ahead and scavenge my work......
Read it and save it before Tom deletes it......
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom C View PostWe all are piecing together info, Because Steve did not use simple plain English and a 10 minute drawing to show how it was done. Remember he came to us, we did not seek him out. we all pull from tesla and Bedini and Schauberger and Russell. Even Patrick Flynn's parallel path is a unique application of known phenomena. He borrowed from others. AND he encouraged replication by posting plans for all to build. If Steve was so worried about "His" IP then he should have stayed quiet and patented his work. otherwise if he comes on a forum to share he should expect people to want to understand, or thru building come to understand. some of us are kinetic learners, we learn by building. I read a ton of books on downdraft carburetor's, did me no good until a holly 650 double pumper was in my hand and I disassembled one. now I can rebuild them in my sleep, don't even need a book, it is all intuitive, but it came after I rebuilt one, not before.
Originally posted by Tom C View PostI did not get from him he was trying to protect anything, but trying to get us to understand what he was doing, without revealing enough that we could replicate it, and in fact buy something from him. you ortho obviously bought it from him, good for you. He needs to pay the forum owners 10% for using it as a platform for sales.
Originally posted by Tom C View PostYou don't need to buy anything to replicate a monopole, rotored or solid state, read John's patents. you don't need to buy anything to replicate Tesla's work, read the patents. Steve encouraged research and for that I am grateful, as I am grateful for all who have contributed to open source knowledge. Steve's discovery occurred while he was researching something else, this current motor/gen is not the first motor/gen he has waved around the internet. I have documents from him that are over 5 years old from another build he was waving around, but that time I did not know his name. now I do! because dave found it on over unity.......
Tom C
You have no idea when the discovery I made occurred, your assumption makes you look bad. The past is the past, you folks digging through old posts will find nothing that will help you comprehend what is being discussed now! The machine you referring to from way back when was never built. Those documents you got....worthless. You people, specifically you and Dave should spend more time in the present......sad really...
The name of the game is misdirection, a tactic used by master magicians. You are told to look here and the magician pulls a rabbit out of his hat. Bedini gave you what......what did he give you Tom! The funny thing is you don't know! The funny thing is you don't have the guts to ask him either. All of you are preoccupied with the magical spike, oblivious of the fact that it didn't create itself......the oblivious is obvious......
To wish you luck would be an insult to all who truly deserve workable principles!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kiril_Kirilov View PostRecognize my style......I hope you do, I don't scavenge, never have and never will, unlike the majority who frequent these pages, and specifically you, I studied, I studied till I couldn't stand it anymore, then I studied more, at the end of this toil, when I finally pulled my head out of the books, patents and articles and cast my gaze upon the free energy scene, I saw what I have been sharing. You don't get it because you are clueless, you have absolutely no idea what you want, and if by chance you have an idea, its not yours, it was borrowed, and because of this you are a lost soul. There is a simple solution for your situation,
Take responsibility for your lack of knowledge.These others you refer to, whom without which I would have nothing, you have them too right, and what do you have to show for your relationship with them, with their works! That's not a question, its clear to all who read your posts what you have....nothing, and that is a fact! Sooo with that said....you go right ahead and scavenge my work......
Read it and save it before Tom deletes it......
What was your real reason for coming here? Was it to help people learn? Remember you came here!!! Yet you refused to share in a proper manner so all forum users, at all levels, can learn... Remember not everyone is blessed with the ability to spend two or more years full time researching, most people have limited time available.
One more thing... don't think so highly of yourself in that you are my only source of information. I learn from where ever I can.
-Dave WingLast edited by Dave Wing; 10-06-2014, 07:33 PM.
Comment
-
Kiril,
please do not post anything else from Erfinder. I do not think you are him, as he is in Germany, you are in Bulgaria. it is not necessary. it only generates a lot of heat and no light. take your toy and go somewhere else. you wont find what you want here, and steve seems to have your holy grail, so if you have something that brings us closer then share otherwise please stop.Last edited by Tom C; 10-07-2014, 01:05 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aln View PostI will have no shame here, If you are reading erfinder, how and why do you increase equatorial poles? Selfish question for selfish reasons. Thanks Aln
I will answer all your questions, however, in return, I request that you never post here again, completely abandon your effort here to dissect my posts, the choice is yours, choose wisely.
Regards
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom C View Postso after reading the chapter on inductance, I did some doodling [ATTACH=CONFIG]3712[/ATTACH] see what you guys think. so we can get alternating poles if we feed the coils A.C. and we can control the output if we switch at the delta zero.
Tom C
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kiril_Kirilov View PostAln,
I will answer all your questions, however, in return, I request that you never post here again, completely abandon your effort here to dissect my posts, the choice is yours, choose wisely.
Regards
Comment
-
a schottky diode is low voltage i dont think one would work here as the voltage climbs very quickly.
Comment
-
ALN
i think i actually know how... wind the coils like jb. i have been working on the idea for my machine in my thread. this is a CRUDE drawing so my apologies for that.Anyway...if you have one coil wrapped around a core then when a voltage is made and current flows the induced magnetic field works against the input magnetism. In a system where the core is wound with two counter wound coils IMAGINE this if you connect the coils like i have shown you end up with negative positive negative...well negative cant cause a flow to negative so there are a couple options i am working with. 1 connect the two negatives together and use the resulting neg and pos....2 use another coil(think kromrey) now you would have neg pos neg on one....pos neg pos on the other. If you were to hook the outer positives and negatives together then tap into the center pos and negatives what would happen? what i see is if you run pos to the center of the upper coil and neg to the center of the bottom...the resulting flow would create a north south junction between the coils on each core. i believe this is what was meant by expanding equitorial pole. Also i believe that the creation of that junction causes other effects. in a core that is magnetized the north and south are always trying to colapse but are never alowed to. so when a core has one coil that creates and oposite force it is a stalemate resulting in the need for energy in to make energy out. however the currents if cause to flow in the way i described in the coil would cause the extra set of poles that CAN COLLAPSE so the resulting force acting against the incoming flux is allowed to just take the flux and send it out the blotch wall....thats why bedini says it blows cold air. instead of shoving against the generating flux it combines the pos and negative and radiates it out causing it to spin faster "pulling the current from pos and negative instead of normal inductive pushing!!!!! hope i helped a bit
any magnetism created by using the coils voltage will instead of causing an increased counter magnetic force it would raise all 4 poles in the core but because the two center are allowed to cancel ther is no net counter force on the flux....a non-destructive generation.
one last thing...i think this is also why the kromrey must have two seperate coils on each core if you wind them together it would not make the ceneter poles that only happens with two counter wound coils on one core with a magnet passing both ends "Kromrey converter!"Last edited by Bradley Malone; 10-13-2014, 06:13 PM.
Comment
Comment