I started this build with the idea of using a lindemann attraction motor to get high speed for little energy then use coil shorting methods to harvest energy without slowing down the rotor. A few things have popped into my head that has me going in a different direction so i figured i would put my idea up here and see what people think...or if someone already tried it let me know please.
The first thing i thought about was "precharging" a cap that you add in series with the coil you are going to short. thoughts behind this are.
1. if the current that flows during the short causes a push (T/F no drag) would adding a small extra push turn the shorted coils themselves into the drive?
2. just as charging caps in parrallel and discharging in series compounds the energy and supposedly gives you extra back out ( same idea as JB tapping batteries with keys)
so would the energy out of the shorted coil be a multiple of the normal shortted current and the cap current T/F bigger energy out.
Then the next thought happened. instead of precharging a cap for the short...could you use the pulse from a battery ...so instead of shorting to itself short to the opposite polarity on the drive battery that would be like stacking the cap energy in series with the battery. then use the battery pulse going through the coil to compound the energy as in a bedini ssg. then instead of just letting it charge another cap...because it has the power of the battery behind it use it to pulse the compounded energy into the lindemann causing attraction in it to pull the magnet away from the coil at the same time you are pulsing the coil to repell the magnet and compound its energy with the battery.
this is a simplified circuit showing what i am getting at.
this picture is a sketchup model of the machine. notice that the iron keeper for the attraction motor part is offset from the magnets on the rotor. this would make it so that when the coils below are shorted into the attraction coil it would have room to pull it in. if the magnets on the rotor were aligned with the keeper then the coils would have to be moved so that the keeper is "not" aligned with the attraction core when the shorting pulse happens.
*edit* there are four magnets because that is how i built it for the original idea. because there are only two alignments of the keeper the other two magnets would be wasted unless i do the shorting as i was saying but use them to charge a cap that i dump into the attraction core at 0 and 180.
these are more complicated ideas using the same thing. the c-cores are an idea i have had for a long time. JB uses half of one in one of his patents. i have heard that if you wind bucking coils on a continuos core and put the positives and negatives in parralel you can supposedly use the energy with no lenz effect (have not tested it but if the kromrey can lower lenz when energy is used then other things can to we just have to figure it out.
The first thing i thought about was "precharging" a cap that you add in series with the coil you are going to short. thoughts behind this are.
1. if the current that flows during the short causes a push (T/F no drag) would adding a small extra push turn the shorted coils themselves into the drive?
2. just as charging caps in parrallel and discharging in series compounds the energy and supposedly gives you extra back out ( same idea as JB tapping batteries with keys)
so would the energy out of the shorted coil be a multiple of the normal shortted current and the cap current T/F bigger energy out.
Then the next thought happened. instead of precharging a cap for the short...could you use the pulse from a battery ...so instead of shorting to itself short to the opposite polarity on the drive battery that would be like stacking the cap energy in series with the battery. then use the battery pulse going through the coil to compound the energy as in a bedini ssg. then instead of just letting it charge another cap...because it has the power of the battery behind it use it to pulse the compounded energy into the lindemann causing attraction in it to pull the magnet away from the coil at the same time you are pulsing the coil to repell the magnet and compound its energy with the battery.
this is a simplified circuit showing what i am getting at.
this picture is a sketchup model of the machine. notice that the iron keeper for the attraction motor part is offset from the magnets on the rotor. this would make it so that when the coils below are shorted into the attraction coil it would have room to pull it in. if the magnets on the rotor were aligned with the keeper then the coils would have to be moved so that the keeper is "not" aligned with the attraction core when the shorting pulse happens.
*edit* there are four magnets because that is how i built it for the original idea. because there are only two alignments of the keeper the other two magnets would be wasted unless i do the shorting as i was saying but use them to charge a cap that i dump into the attraction core at 0 and 180.
these are more complicated ideas using the same thing. the c-cores are an idea i have had for a long time. JB uses half of one in one of his patents. i have heard that if you wind bucking coils on a continuos core and put the positives and negatives in parralel you can supposedly use the energy with no lenz effect (have not tested it but if the kromrey can lower lenz when energy is used then other things can to we just have to figure it out.
Comment