On a related forum there was a post about what projects you are currently working on. I’ll say I have been working on one wire transmission of power and trying to figure out more about induction as it is seen in the sorts of coils Tesla used and looking to use diodes which respond to faster pulse rates to see what happens at higher Hertz.
Quite likely in the near future I will have much much less time for this hobby so I thought I would just throw out a few ideas of what I would like to see looked at, looked into, maybe accomplished etc. I only have two ideas here, hopefully others will throw in others. I think the “luminaries” of free energy who are either on this board or likely will be, or people with sound mechanical and/or electrical engineering skills and resources could maybe accomplish this an order of magnitude faster than me, -well, I will admit I’ve done more than I expected in this hobby so maybe 2 to 4 times as fast, well probably ten times as fast or more. Anyways the point being, I expect I could maybe do these projects and if so others could likely do them more easily. As a last comment before the details, I am always thankful to John Bedini and many many others (though especially John - who without sarcasm I feel embarrassed not to refer to as Dr.) for showing me or reminding me of the majesty and mystery of nature. The magnitude of some of this almost necessitates some defensive humor on my part. So yes, JB you have shown how the world energy crisis is solved through application of Tesla’s principles and open sourced the concepts of your work with the world, you built some motors through a more fundamental understanding of induction and magnetic fields that could also power the world, I saw some illustration of V-gates that I thought that was promising then saw you built that (and it worked) a long time ago, you apparently have some rock battery that people make with cheap off the shelf stuff that runs for months and some electromagnetic zapper that might cure all infectious disease, etc, but and here is the punchline, “what have you done for me lately?” or alternatively “what does it matter in the face of eternity?” Alright, enough, here’s a couple ideas for anyone and everyone, maybe they’ve been done already and if so please tell me. And in all humility, thank you Dr. Bedini!
1) Bedini-Milkovik hybrid
Veljko Milkovik has seen something quite astonishing in regards to a lever on a fulcrum unbalanced by a pendulum on one end. To get up to speed on this I would recommend this video Veljko Milkovic - Two-Stage Mechanical Oscillations Research - YouTube and his homepage Veljko Milkovic - Home Page - Official presentation of the researcher and inventor Veljko Milkovic. In a nutshell it doesn’t follow Newtonian mechanics and is a really large macroscale, simple illustration of such an exception. I believe Dr. Peter Lindemann, while I may not have the quote exactly right, said something along the lines of, it was the biggest advance in mechanics in 400 years. I would just add to this, that to my thinking, Mr. Milkovik’s insight is at the very height of scientific progress. It is something that has been in front of all of our noses forever and pretty much every day but never actually seen. Now yes, I haven’t replicated it and it may be in error, but I really don’t think so. I keep thinking in my mind of a palette of bricks being raised up on a board with two ropes where one rope came loose and the board and palette keep swinging wildly. Just common sense, you wouldn’t try to stop this system by grabbing the loose end of the swinging board you would stop the swinging bricks. However, per Newtonian mechanics, for every reaction there is an equal and opposite reaction it shouldn’t matter which side you try to dampen.
So there is an increase in COP by using a pendulum attached to a see saw. Milkovek reports it as approximately 11 fold. Additionally they are at the point now of providing guidance on where the fulcrum should be and other design issues. Seeing the great increase in motive power possible, at some point in a video Mr. Milkovik mentions using the unemployed to provide motive power for electrical generation. Oh Veljko, how very very gauche! I’d say use it in place of conscription!! Keep all those young’uns with their raging hormones being useful, productive and not killing other people or spreading venereal diseases. Much more politically correct.
While I haven’t replicated this work, I have seen for instance, a retired construction company president build very large versions 10 feett tall showing how one can raise very large weights with minimal input to the swinging pendulum. So far there has been difficulty in finding a simple way of feeding the output power back towards running the machine. I believe this construction engineer last I checked was basically trying to rebuild a very large grandfathers clock as a possible solution.
Now then, even before Bedini, the first instance of using a magnet on the end of a pendulum, swinging over an electromagnet where the swing of the magnet triggered the pulse of the electromagnet was a Russian scientist trying to make a very accurate clock. But really who on this board could replicate anything like that, a pulse motor that detects a swinging magnet and pulses at exactly the right time, come on, that’s crazy talk.
So now we have a Melkovik system with the pendulum pulsed by a pulse motor, the last part would be closing the loop. While I worked in high school at a gas station I can’t lay claim to being a gear head at all, still I know that you have a lever moving up and down and just like a piston you could turn that into rotary motion. From there you generate electricity and feed it back into the battery powering the pulse motor. (As I think of it now maybe you don’t even need to translate it into rotary motion). I think this is the most straightforward way of making a self running Melkovik device especially in building off the strengths of this forum, heck the grandfather’s clock approach might also work. Eeerrp, forgot that last sentence, I meant to say, in euphemistic BS speak that, with astonishing effort and Rube Goldberg engineering one might, might, build something that degrades to inevitable death two percent more slowly. Whew!
2) Rotating Electret
“Ibepointless” introduced me to the concept of the “captret”. ... Alright he introduced me to the concept of the “electret” as well. Now before going into that, we can mention another area where the great Isaac Newton’s theories are insufficient, that is whenever there is significant rotational motion, think of a child’s spinning top. The late Bruce DePalma observed and documented this. Similarly Dr. Eric Laithwaite Phd, DSc, who invented the magnetic levitation train made a most inconvenient observation Eric Laithwaite - gyroscopic gravity modification.mov - YouTube. He presented to the English Royal society that a rotating mass loses weight. First time in two hundred years that the minutes of such a presentation were banned. He later represented this material as part of the children’s Christmas lecture series, part one here Eric Laithwaite. I believe Dr. Laithwaite has a patent for anti-gravity though couldn’t follow the patent. He did say, I believe, that with a cup full of Uranium he could get you to the stars.
So I looked up the electret when I heard of it and Wikipedia has this odd thing to say.
I really know nothing of such things but will accept this as valid for the moment. Many questions and thoughts come to the fore. This is quite analogous to a magnet in the presence of a wire coil. Nothing happens at rest, an electrical force is generated in motion. Does the electret obey the same “laws” as regards the strength of its force, the strength of the magnet and the speed of motion? What is this force? Does it follow the same pattern as the changes Dr. Laithwaite demonstrated in regards to a rotating mass, if either the same or different how does the magnitude of this force compare.
Alright, as the late Graham Chapman was wont to say in his General’s uniform on Monty Python,”This sketch is getting too silly, we’ll have none of that.”
To close
"What can we gain by sailing to the moon if we are not able to cross the abyss that separates us from ourselves? This is the most important of all voyages of discovery, and without it, all the rest are not only useless, but disastrous.” Thomas Merton
Quite likely in the near future I will have much much less time for this hobby so I thought I would just throw out a few ideas of what I would like to see looked at, looked into, maybe accomplished etc. I only have two ideas here, hopefully others will throw in others. I think the “luminaries” of free energy who are either on this board or likely will be, or people with sound mechanical and/or electrical engineering skills and resources could maybe accomplish this an order of magnitude faster than me, -well, I will admit I’ve done more than I expected in this hobby so maybe 2 to 4 times as fast, well probably ten times as fast or more. Anyways the point being, I expect I could maybe do these projects and if so others could likely do them more easily. As a last comment before the details, I am always thankful to John Bedini and many many others (though especially John - who without sarcasm I feel embarrassed not to refer to as Dr.) for showing me or reminding me of the majesty and mystery of nature. The magnitude of some of this almost necessitates some defensive humor on my part. So yes, JB you have shown how the world energy crisis is solved through application of Tesla’s principles and open sourced the concepts of your work with the world, you built some motors through a more fundamental understanding of induction and magnetic fields that could also power the world, I saw some illustration of V-gates that I thought that was promising then saw you built that (and it worked) a long time ago, you apparently have some rock battery that people make with cheap off the shelf stuff that runs for months and some electromagnetic zapper that might cure all infectious disease, etc, but and here is the punchline, “what have you done for me lately?” or alternatively “what does it matter in the face of eternity?” Alright, enough, here’s a couple ideas for anyone and everyone, maybe they’ve been done already and if so please tell me. And in all humility, thank you Dr. Bedini!
1) Bedini-Milkovik hybrid
Veljko Milkovik has seen something quite astonishing in regards to a lever on a fulcrum unbalanced by a pendulum on one end. To get up to speed on this I would recommend this video Veljko Milkovic - Two-Stage Mechanical Oscillations Research - YouTube and his homepage Veljko Milkovic - Home Page - Official presentation of the researcher and inventor Veljko Milkovic. In a nutshell it doesn’t follow Newtonian mechanics and is a really large macroscale, simple illustration of such an exception. I believe Dr. Peter Lindemann, while I may not have the quote exactly right, said something along the lines of, it was the biggest advance in mechanics in 400 years. I would just add to this, that to my thinking, Mr. Milkovik’s insight is at the very height of scientific progress. It is something that has been in front of all of our noses forever and pretty much every day but never actually seen. Now yes, I haven’t replicated it and it may be in error, but I really don’t think so. I keep thinking in my mind of a palette of bricks being raised up on a board with two ropes where one rope came loose and the board and palette keep swinging wildly. Just common sense, you wouldn’t try to stop this system by grabbing the loose end of the swinging board you would stop the swinging bricks. However, per Newtonian mechanics, for every reaction there is an equal and opposite reaction it shouldn’t matter which side you try to dampen.
So there is an increase in COP by using a pendulum attached to a see saw. Milkovek reports it as approximately 11 fold. Additionally they are at the point now of providing guidance on where the fulcrum should be and other design issues. Seeing the great increase in motive power possible, at some point in a video Mr. Milkovik mentions using the unemployed to provide motive power for electrical generation. Oh Veljko, how very very gauche! I’d say use it in place of conscription!! Keep all those young’uns with their raging hormones being useful, productive and not killing other people or spreading venereal diseases. Much more politically correct.
While I haven’t replicated this work, I have seen for instance, a retired construction company president build very large versions 10 feett tall showing how one can raise very large weights with minimal input to the swinging pendulum. So far there has been difficulty in finding a simple way of feeding the output power back towards running the machine. I believe this construction engineer last I checked was basically trying to rebuild a very large grandfathers clock as a possible solution.
Now then, even before Bedini, the first instance of using a magnet on the end of a pendulum, swinging over an electromagnet where the swing of the magnet triggered the pulse of the electromagnet was a Russian scientist trying to make a very accurate clock. But really who on this board could replicate anything like that, a pulse motor that detects a swinging magnet and pulses at exactly the right time, come on, that’s crazy talk.
So now we have a Melkovik system with the pendulum pulsed by a pulse motor, the last part would be closing the loop. While I worked in high school at a gas station I can’t lay claim to being a gear head at all, still I know that you have a lever moving up and down and just like a piston you could turn that into rotary motion. From there you generate electricity and feed it back into the battery powering the pulse motor. (As I think of it now maybe you don’t even need to translate it into rotary motion). I think this is the most straightforward way of making a self running Melkovik device especially in building off the strengths of this forum, heck the grandfather’s clock approach might also work. Eeerrp, forgot that last sentence, I meant to say, in euphemistic BS speak that, with astonishing effort and Rube Goldberg engineering one might, might, build something that degrades to inevitable death two percent more slowly. Whew!
2) Rotating Electret
“Ibepointless” introduced me to the concept of the “captret”. ... Alright he introduced me to the concept of the “electret” as well. Now before going into that, we can mention another area where the great Isaac Newton’s theories are insufficient, that is whenever there is significant rotational motion, think of a child’s spinning top. The late Bruce DePalma observed and documented this. Similarly Dr. Eric Laithwaite Phd, DSc, who invented the magnetic levitation train made a most inconvenient observation Eric Laithwaite - gyroscopic gravity modification.mov - YouTube. He presented to the English Royal society that a rotating mass loses weight. First time in two hundred years that the minutes of such a presentation were banned. He later represented this material as part of the children’s Christmas lecture series, part one here Eric Laithwaite. I believe Dr. Laithwaite has a patent for anti-gravity though couldn’t follow the patent. He did say, I believe, that with a cup full of Uranium he could get you to the stars.
So I looked up the electret when I heard of it and Wikipedia has this odd thing to say.
“When a magnet and an electret are near one another, a rather unusual phenomenon occurs: while stationary, neither has any effect on one another. However, when an electret is moved with respect to a magnetic pole, a force is felt which acts perpendicular to the magnetic field, pushing the electret along a path 90 degrees to the expected direction of 'push' as would be felt with another magnet.”
I really know nothing of such things but will accept this as valid for the moment. Many questions and thoughts come to the fore. This is quite analogous to a magnet in the presence of a wire coil. Nothing happens at rest, an electrical force is generated in motion. Does the electret obey the same “laws” as regards the strength of its force, the strength of the magnet and the speed of motion? What is this force? Does it follow the same pattern as the changes Dr. Laithwaite demonstrated in regards to a rotating mass, if either the same or different how does the magnitude of this force compare.
2a) Extra Credit. Build an electret powered toy quadropeter and fly it to the moon, credit given for Youtube videos posted demonstrating mastery of said subject material.
Alright, as the late Graham Chapman was wont to say in his General’s uniform on Monty Python,”This sketch is getting too silly, we’ll have none of that.”
To close
"What can we gain by sailing to the moon if we are not able to cross the abyss that separates us from ourselves? This is the most important of all voyages of discovery, and without it, all the rest are not only useless, but disastrous.” Thomas Merton
Comment