Plasma Ignition | Plasma Jet Ignition

[heysoundude]

smh = shake my head
I believe you have access to my email if you click my username and view my profile. If not, send me a direct message and I'll provide it to you privately

[nuvisys]

SMH and facepalm

the second, i understand. the first i do not. smh = lol? You seem to be the most persistent on this forum. I like your style, sir. One of these days, we could communicate via email?

Do you know that before the videos, so many negative comments? Perhaps, all of them. Now, there is/are no negative comment, not even one.

Everybody now understand the principles. Nobody can make it simpler. It's like A-B-C or 1-2-3. Even a high school stude understand how it works based on the basic laws of science. like poles/charges, repel... unlike poles, attract...

[heysoundude]

SMH and facepalm

[nuvisys]

there is (are?) the Euro 5-6 standard(s), aren't there? why not shoot for meeting and exceeding them?

"The simplest way to solve a problem is, invariably, the correct one."
"K.I.S.S."

Oooo, a tall order for me. Actually, I have that in mind, months ago. I have several mods to do on the two devices but preferred not to because it involves time and money. I will have to buy a euro 1 car and an emissions/gas analyzer.

Just when I had succeeded in 'cleaning' two-stroke engines, they changed the rules; they phased-out the Suzuki/Yamaha motorcycles. It would be cheaper if manufacturers continue producing 2 stroke engines instead of the 4 stroke variety. The solution is already here!

You are right, sir. Since K (light absorption coefficient) is brought down to less than 1% (0.5 - 0.76%) it would be an unsurmountable objective to bring it to almost zero. There would always be losses. Even pure gold/silver is not pure (99.999%).

We once installed the devices on a chinese made euro 6 compliant car. The best we could do was bring down the K (from 0.11% down to 0.09% Zero emissions is difficult but not impossible!

[heysoundude]

there is (are?) the Euro 5-6 standard(s), aren't there? why not shoot for meeting and exceeding them?

[nuvisys]

These are really quite passive-aggressive trolling statements, you realize.
are plasma and your devices incompatible? Why? What makes you so sure? If you can't disclose your reasons because of Proprietary technology or trademarked patented confidentiality or whatever, you really have to stop talking about it and talk about your plasma implementation on your car.

I believe that plasma ignition is worth diy'ing on a car. I can't say for sure if it could improve our revo, unless I disable the device/s. The revo has passed euro 4 standards and I could make it better, but, what for? The online circuit could be much different from the circuit of Engr. Aaron. There are no confidentiality clause involved here. Yes, I realized that I became a troll but I was answering queries online. Don't worry, sir, I will notify you of developments by pms, and others, too if requested(when I will be given the permission to make contact with members of this prestigious forum).

[heysoundude]

Engr. Aaron's thread has been polluted with OT comments. It's time to go back to plasma ignition. I found a circuit diagram online but our 2002 revo is in such perfect condition comparable to euro 4 compliant cars. If i disable the device's, the emissions will be too pungent (worst than diesel smog), invisible but deadly.

These are really quite passive-aggressive trolling statements, you realize.
are plasma and your devices incompatible? Why? What makes you so sure? If you can't disclose your reasons because of Proprietary technology or trademarked patented confidentiality or whatever, you really have to stop talking about it and talk about your plasma implementation on your car.

[nuvisys]

[QUOTE=heysoundude;32173]I'm sure once your patent applications are evaluated and EPA/CARB look at them, you'll go into production and need to market. A new thread would probably be best for those discussions [/QUOTE

Engr. Aaron's thread has been polluted with OT comments. It's time to go back to plasma ignition. I found a circuit diagram online but our 2002 revo is in such perfect condition comparable to euro 4 compliant cars. If i disable the device's, the emissions will be too pungent (worst than diesel smog), invisible but deadly.

[heysoundude]

I'm sure once your patent applications are evaluated and EPA/CARB look at them, you'll go into production and need to market. A new thread would probably be best for those discussions

[nuvisys]

Imo, I have broken the rules on posting OT comments. I am sorry, I got excited.

[heysoundude]

OT: First, the good news. Last year, a mining engineer from australia heard about our technology. Since he is a friend of my son, he came to actually see a demo. I presumed, he was impressed. He told us that he is interested to patent the technology in the USA. After getting the papers, signatures, etc..

I just received the news that it is already filed as a provisionary patent. Wow, a dream come true, since I always wanted to make dpf/egr obsolete. A flawed design, imo. Testing is sked within this year, EPA or CARB and some universities.


Engr. Aaron Murakami, thank you for not banning me. Really appreciate it, sir.

Please keep us in the loop with results from EPA & CARB testing. Good luck with the patent process.

[nuvisys]

Engr. Aaron Murakami, thank you for not banning me. Really appreciate it, sir.

[nuvisys]

Hi Nuvisys,

How does this equate with the following quotes?


So I'm to believe that you invented, tested, and sell the Nuvitron devices for diesel engines without understanding auto-mechanics?

The devices are for diesel and gasoline engines.

You are right, sir. Sometimes, I am puzzled why this happened. All my knowledge about automotive mechanics is what i learned from forums and YT (google, too).

It all started when I came home from nearly 15 years of work in KSA (hf/vhf communications). I came home with a magnetic fuel saver (eco-flow) from UK. I bought a 2nd hand fb300 and installed it. Nothing happened. After travelling more than 150km-200km, the engine noise suddenly became reduced (1/3-1/2). That started it all. No effect on emissions; reduced engine noise and nearly 10% savings (max). One device was invented in 2002, w/ more than 20% savings, the other device in 2004, reduced emissions. In 2008, found out that the two devices were complementing each other (unity of invention). Savings increased to more than 30%.

On other forums, got a thousand bad comments (BS, horse poo, horse s***, snake oil) They called me a scammer, a fraud, a nut, a mental case, etc. We got the device tested by our environmental management bureau.

Two or three forums even banned me. Now, our govt is using it for dirty diesel vehicles after testing it. Maybe, Rudolf had guided me all along, after the EU/Germany/France announced that they will phaseout his invention. Most likely, maybe? I mean, the guidance.

[Gary Hammond]

Hi Nuvisys,

firozmusthafa, the good thing about what you are doing is you enjoy your work, that's a good thing. As for me, I am basically an electronics enthusiast. Difficult to grasp auto-mechanics. Like having two left foot, if you know what i mean. Wrong hole!

How does this equate with the following quotes?

heysoundude, de-carboning engines/exhaust systems seems like a good observation, however, imo, the reason the emission is greatly reduced is, negative air molecules and positive fuel molecules are drawn in the mixing chamber, which are mixed to the highest level resulting in almost total combustion. Disabling the devices will result in heavy smoke after a few seconds.

There had been several theories on how the device's greatly affect emissions. (three or four theories up-to-date)

Plasma theoretically allows for a more complete oxidization of the air-fuel charge in the combustion chamber. the benefits would be allowing someone to fine tune fuel consumption, and the side effect/result would be lowered emissions/costs of operation/equipment longevity
from what I recall, nuvisys' technology mixes air and fuel more evenly/completely prior to combustion. this causes automated fuel delivery systems to theoretically trim back to a predetermined "stoichiometric" ratio. a strong and more precisely timed ignition event (such as from plasma) allows for most efficient operation of an engine. I think it's a good investment, if you're the type of person who buys a vehicle and uses it over the long term, to add these types of enhancements, as the costs are likely quickly offset by fuel savings, and your emissions are likely well below standards, possibly even below measurable limits.

So I'm to believe that you invented, tested, and sell the Nuvitron devices for diesel engines without understanding auto-mechanics?

[nuvisys]

firozmusthafa, the good thing about what you are doing is you enjoy your work, that's a good thing. As for me, I am basically an electronics enthusiast. Difficult to grasp auto-mechanics. Like having two left foot, if you know what i mean. Wrong hole!