Originally posted by erfinder
View Post
Aye! Now, being a member of the peanut gallery, I cannot speak for the competent authority. I don't know why JB went to the Bedini/Cole switch, I can only speculate. I am not an insider, I don't get to rub shoulders with JB and am not privileged to take walks with him through his shop and get the good first hand info direct from the source, however, my past life as a blood hound makes me good (at least in my mind) at sniffing out pieces to a puzzle and putting them together.
The SG portion of the Ferris wheel is a massive mismatched impedance network using three coils. I think the significance of this asymmetrical mechanism went way way way over the heads of everyone in attendance, and everyone on the forum the year following the 2010 disclosure. I don't think this was the desired response, so, the topic was revisited at the 2011 conference.
The following quotes are from the 2011 conference, comments in orange are mine.
From EFTV 28
JB
"What we wanna do with this machine is, we wanna be able to:
• collect the charges
• charge up the battery quickly
And there's only one way to do that and that's with a capacitor dup at the correct frequency and correct resonance. (no further information or commentary regarding frequency and resonance was provided.)"
"The coils are on the same line, coils are on one set of wires, one has an iron core and one has an air core, and you're saying why did John throw the coil behind the big coil. Cause we couldn't tune the machine, it's a tuning mechanism to get the machine to run."
"Eric do you want to explain that the machine wouldn't run."
Eric
"That was after we figured out that the magnetic fields were too close. So then we tried it at 12v and we could get it to run as an SG, then we tried it at 24v and it would self-oscillate. So that's when we decided to switch to the Bedini/Cole switch to drive the motor. That sped it up significantly but it still wouldn't run quite as good as we like and that's when we added the second coil."
JB
"But we added that second coil to get the energy out of the machine. "
(WHAT THE FUUK???? You just said you added for tuning purposes, you said you added it because the machine wouldn't run!!!! Not that I'm complaining....)
"Because the original Bedini/Cole switch........"
"Cold is more organized and the hot is disorganized..."
"Right, that's what happens when the alignment takes place, that takes place that we were talking about. But I couldn't get the energy out of the coil under this motor situation and I couldn't get the energy out of this motor situation. (referring to wooden three Bedini/Cole switched SG) So the solution to my problem was to have one organized and one disorganized, and take it from the disorganized one. Compress it and take it, the same way the SG does."
"Now some of you have tried to build these motors using the Bedini/Cole circuit right. And some of you can get some energy out, some of you don't get any energy out because I watched. I watched a whole years of internet chatter...."
"That's how you get the energy out by misbalancing these two. This does not equal that (pointing at the large and small coil in ErikN's machine.) So there's two different impedance's, so to get the energy out of this (pointing at the high impedance) I had to misbalance it and believe me it drove us nuts for a little while......"
End of quotes
This post is about the effects of transformer action found in the SG between the trigger and the power coil. It should be clear that this relationship was well understood by JB in the prior art, where many have stagnated, as they are still working with the SG in the prior art. In the present art the same coils are now being switched using the highly modified Bedini/Cole switch, this switching topology eliminates the output limitations found in the SG. It should be clear that what I am suggesting, compliments what is already known and well established by the inventor, and in no way contradicts nor questions his disclosure. From the quotes I came to the conclusion that the true significance of the additional coil is for the expressed purpose of establishing an imbalance in the impedance of the coil, tuning is secondary to this. The goal is to get the energy out, the very same energy which is trapped in the SG of the prior art.
It should be clear that impedance mismatching is imperative, this was demonstrated from day one, in the prior art. As experience is the best teacher, I appreciate being shown the prior art first and then being allowed to work towards a better understanding of the relations between the various varying circuit parameters and conditions. Resonance and frequency were mentioned, but weren't discussed, speaking from my own experience, once those two find their place in the present art, the COP of the circuit will be not be a relation between input and output, it will be related between input and reactive power to real power out. The idea being when the circuit is operating where it should, you can draw from the source, but the source is replenished at the end of each cycle, in excess of what you draw from it, so technically you have no input. This is why the battery is significant. It's there but it's not.....
Regards
The SG portion of the Ferris wheel is a massive mismatched impedance network using three coils. I think the significance of this asymmetrical mechanism went way way way over the heads of everyone in attendance, and everyone on the forum the year following the 2010 disclosure. I don't think this was the desired response, so, the topic was revisited at the 2011 conference.
The following quotes are from the 2011 conference, comments in orange are mine.
From EFTV 28
JB
"What we wanna do with this machine is, we wanna be able to:
• collect the charges
• charge up the battery quickly
And there's only one way to do that and that's with a capacitor dup at the correct frequency and correct resonance. (no further information or commentary regarding frequency and resonance was provided.)"
"The coils are on the same line, coils are on one set of wires, one has an iron core and one has an air core, and you're saying why did John throw the coil behind the big coil. Cause we couldn't tune the machine, it's a tuning mechanism to get the machine to run."
"Eric do you want to explain that the machine wouldn't run."
Eric
"That was after we figured out that the magnetic fields were too close. So then we tried it at 12v and we could get it to run as an SG, then we tried it at 24v and it would self-oscillate. So that's when we decided to switch to the Bedini/Cole switch to drive the motor. That sped it up significantly but it still wouldn't run quite as good as we like and that's when we added the second coil."
JB
"But we added that second coil to get the energy out of the machine. "
(WHAT THE FUUK???? You just said you added for tuning purposes, you said you added it because the machine wouldn't run!!!! Not that I'm complaining....)
"Because the original Bedini/Cole switch........"
"Cold is more organized and the hot is disorganized..."
"Right, that's what happens when the alignment takes place, that takes place that we were talking about. But I couldn't get the energy out of the coil under this motor situation and I couldn't get the energy out of this motor situation. (referring to wooden three Bedini/Cole switched SG) So the solution to my problem was to have one organized and one disorganized, and take it from the disorganized one. Compress it and take it, the same way the SG does."
"Now some of you have tried to build these motors using the Bedini/Cole circuit right. And some of you can get some energy out, some of you don't get any energy out because I watched. I watched a whole years of internet chatter...."
"That's how you get the energy out by misbalancing these two. This does not equal that (pointing at the large and small coil in ErikN's machine.) So there's two different impedance's, so to get the energy out of this (pointing at the high impedance) I had to misbalance it and believe me it drove us nuts for a little while......"
End of quotes
This post is about the effects of transformer action found in the SG between the trigger and the power coil. It should be clear that this relationship was well understood by JB in the prior art, where many have stagnated, as they are still working with the SG in the prior art. In the present art the same coils are now being switched using the highly modified Bedini/Cole switch, this switching topology eliminates the output limitations found in the SG. It should be clear that what I am suggesting, compliments what is already known and well established by the inventor, and in no way contradicts nor questions his disclosure. From the quotes I came to the conclusion that the true significance of the additional coil is for the expressed purpose of establishing an imbalance in the impedance of the coil, tuning is secondary to this. The goal is to get the energy out, the very same energy which is trapped in the SG of the prior art.
It should be clear that impedance mismatching is imperative, this was demonstrated from day one, in the prior art. As experience is the best teacher, I appreciate being shown the prior art first and then being allowed to work towards a better understanding of the relations between the various varying circuit parameters and conditions. Resonance and frequency were mentioned, but weren't discussed, speaking from my own experience, once those two find their place in the present art, the COP of the circuit will be not be a relation between input and output, it will be related between input and reactive power to real power out. The idea being when the circuit is operating where it should, you can draw from the source, but the source is replenished at the end of each cycle, in excess of what you draw from it, so technically you have no input. This is why the battery is significant. It's there but it's not.....
Regards
Leave a comment: