Heh not all 50 worked out for the best though.
I want to point you to an old thread where I first introduced these concepts. I went on to experiment with many different things around the basic idea and from that work I learned a lot more than I knew when I wrote it, I had just begun to pursue it. This was done on a wheel not SS but the method was basically the same. Really all I want you to see is the explanation of my idea, never mind all the comments and banter.
I had really hoped that people would catch on too it but I don't think it was really understood what I was talking about and the post fell to it's grave as most do ;-)
It's just easier point to this instead of hash it all over again.
http://www.energyscienceforum.com/sh...?t=1110&page=2
*EDIT*
By the way the timing example in that post is not the same as in the other video. That is one of the other many variations I played with. I also learned that I could switch down to 5ms, anyway like I said this was when I started out with it not the final conclusions.
I want to point you to an old thread where I first introduced these concepts. I went on to experiment with many different things around the basic idea and from that work I learned a lot more than I knew when I wrote it, I had just begun to pursue it. This was done on a wheel not SS but the method was basically the same. Really all I want you to see is the explanation of my idea, never mind all the comments and banter.
I had really hoped that people would catch on too it but I don't think it was really understood what I was talking about and the post fell to it's grave as most do ;-)
It's just easier point to this instead of hash it all over again.
http://www.energyscienceforum.com/sh...?t=1110&page=2
*EDIT*
By the way the timing example in that post is not the same as in the other video. That is one of the other many variations I played with. I also learned that I could switch down to 5ms, anyway like I said this was when I started out with it not the final conclusions.
Comment