Originally posted by fathershand
View Post
all done, updated the first post to add the core of the spool is 18mm in diameter.
I've since changed the setup a few times since the first post. The frame and the bike wheel rotor with the super poles is the same. The circuit I'm testing now is a 10 filar coil on the same sized spool. 130' of 9 x #20 and 1 x #23 for the trigger, twisted clockwise.
The circuit board is the regular SSG circuit with 9 transistors, 470 ohm resistors on each of the bases and all diodes are 1N4007's. The only modification is a FWBR on the output as per the video John Bedini showed in the http://www.energyscienceforum.com/be....html#post2815 thread.
I'm doing some testing with and without the comparator that John showed in that video of various batteries in varying states of health and recording charge and discharge tests with a CBA.
I have already completed some testing of the coil wound both clockwise and counter clockwise, or in both attraction and repulsion modes. Interesting to note that with my super pole rotor I am seeing better results in repulsion mode. My theory is that due to the narrow beam of the super pole north magnets, the mechanical energy produced in attraction mode is not as much as in repulsion mode. I think that with a rotor with magnets in the standard configuration would produce better results. I'm building another rotor with standard magnets to prove this theory, but it will take a while to finish the rotor.
Hopefully I'll get a video done of the setup over the weekend to post to the group.
John K.
Comment