James Gray 3rd's SSG 20 run journal, spreadsheet, and supporting docs

[James_Somewhere_In_Idaho]

This thread is where I am posting my 20 run ssg results and supporting documents. Please find the attached photos. My "experimentor's Journal" and my "20 run spreadsheet" will follow shortly, as my final charging/discharging cycle will be completed later today.

[James_Somewhere_In_Idaho]

Here are a couple more photos

Here are a couple more photos of my build:

[James_Somewhere_In_Idaho]

Here is my "Experimentor's Journal" part 1

Preliminaries

23.5 inch bike wheel, 16 ceramic magnets, wooden frame, circuit buit on perf-board using the MJL21194 transistor, coil built from magnet wires of appropriate size scavanged from old TV sets, spool made from pvc pipe with pvc cutouts glues on the ends, power supply is a "Skynet" 12 volt unit producing 12.25 volts at up to 3 amps. The battery was a new 5 ah, that I used at 80 percent (4 ah) of its rating.

First Set of 5 Charge/Discharge Cycles

With these first 5 runs, my goal is to attempt to consistently run the charge up to 14.5 volts on the battery, and then discharge it using a 200 ma 12 volt lamp (it actually pulls 180 ma), pulling it down to 12.25 volts (note: the power supply runs at 12.25 volts, as stated above). HOWEVER, determining when to stop the charging process at precisely 14.5 volts (or anywhere near that) has been very difficult, as it seems to take the majority of time charging the battery to 13.5-13.8 volts, and then within minutes, it's way beyond 15 volts. Setting alarms has not helped me yet, but it appears that that it takes approximately 20 hours to reach the target voltage, so I am confident that the process is happening correctly. I am determined to get a handle on this (stopping at 14.5 volts instead of letting it go past that) over the next 5 charge/discharge cycles. So far, more than not, it appears that it takes approximately .2-.235Amps to run the system (depending on whether I measure with an analog meter or a digital meter) and the battery takes about .07 amps charging. The system COP seems to hover between .30-.40, while the battery COP seems to hover near 1.2..which is great! This tells me that something is making the battery behave at an efficiency rating greater than 1 COP, even though the machine has a lower efficiency rating, somewhat near what one would expect a conventional system to function at...interesting...The “h” waves on the oscilloscope seem to show consistent 200 volt spikes. I have it tuned to run at approximately 200 RPM (depending on time of day, solar activity, etc???), and I tuned it so that the “h” waves have just stabilized from double strikes into single, with the potentiometer set at the sweet spot of approximately .2-.235 amps.(again, depending on analog or digital meter). It runs at between .36-.42 outside of the sweet spot, seemingly no mater what speed the wheel runs at. I try to zero it in as close to .2, as I can, every charge run (I have decided that I should tune the machine using the analog meter instead of digital, as the analog meter shows a steadier state).. The battery consistently takes .07 amps charging...barely a trickle...and one would think it would not be fully charged within the 20 hour time-frame, but it certainly does. OK...I will write more after 5 more cycles.

Second Set of 5 Charge/Discharge Cycles

Mid 5-run note: This is the 8th cycle run. It seems I have narrowed down my timing in regard to “catching” the charge cycle at 14.5 volts. However, while starting this new cycle, I noticed a couple anomalies. One, the scope is registering a different looking “h” wave, and two, while tuning the sweet-spot, the energizer seemed more finicky than usual, and it ended up needing slightly higher milliamp load than normal...235+, rather than .2. I am wondering if the solar X flair and consequent CME pointed directly at Earth has something to do with it...things to ponder... It is the 9th cycle run and the machine tuned normally (sans the finicky thing)...did the solar X-flair CME caused the anomaly??? I don't know. I think I am getting my timing down pretty well. Incidentally, the batteries COP was slightly reduced, along with the machine's “finickiness.” I went a little over the last time charging due to me nodding of for a couple minutes, causing the battery to charge past my anticipated stopping point. I have my alarm set, lets see if I can get it right this time. This is end of the 9th charging cycle. Apparently, this charge cycle was quite a bit quicker, as I had set my alarm for ½ hour prior to my anticipated end of charge, based on prior data, yet the system had already charged way beyond my target voltage...15.64 Volts, vs 14.5 Volts. I should be prepared to check on its progress far in advanced next cycle, to see if this is progressive and ongoing...Additional note: It took approximately 9% less joules to charge the battery to this “overcharged point” (15.64), than it did to previously charge it to the correct voltage ( approximately 14.5). 10th charging run...it took, yet, less time to charge up past the required amount. Approximately 19.5 hours to 15.62 volts this time. I should set my alarm for 19 hour on the next charging run, as I believe that it is charging to its fullest, an entire hour and a half quicker than previously. What I learned during the second of 5 charge/discharge cycles: The battery seems to be requiring shorter and shorter periods of time to fully charge, (decreased joules, amp/hours, etc) while at the same time, it is beginning to take longer to discharge (increased output joules, amp/hours, etc). The battery COP is consistently >1 and seems to be increasing. The system COP, while still <1, seems to be slightly increasing as well. All-in-all, this set of 5 charge/discharge cycles, even though the battery has been consistently operating above 1 COP, seems to have been a tipping point, in regard to battery behavior indicating something other than standard electrical schema is in operation.

[James_Somewhere_In_Idaho]

My &quot;experimentor's Journal&quot; part 2

Third Set of 5 Charge/Discharge Cycles

Just finished the “charging” portion of cycle 12. I finally was able to “catch” the battery as it hit 14.5 volts (for the second time...with only two other times catching it close to the mark). It took 20 hours to bring the charge from 12.44 volts, up to 13.56 volts, then one more hour to bring it up to 14.5 volts. Note: the voltage, for that last hour, seemed to jump around a lot, then settle down. For instance, several times during that last hour, the voltage zoomed up past 14.5 volts, only to settle down to under 14 volts again. Though, most of the time, the voltage appeared to steadily advance. I caught the voltage at 14.5 volts (verified with a second volt meter in case I was experiencing a false reading) while on a steady rise...YEAH! During this third set of 5 charge/discharge cycles, it has become apparent that the amount of time and energy it takes to charge the battery has diminished some, while the output time/energy has generally remained the same—further indicating something happening to the battery that conventional electrical theory, does not explain.

Final Set of 5 Charging/Discharging cycles

I had an opportunity to observe, for over a one hour period, the end of this first of the final 5 charge/discharge cycles. It took less than 18 ½ hours to charge past 14.5 volts this time. In fact, it took 18 hours to get to 13.78 volts, and less than a half hour to zoom up past 14.5...ending at 14.75 volts. Strangely, it only took a couple minutes to charge from 14.15 to 14.75! The battery is taking FAR less time to fully charge—a further indication that the battery is taking on a condition in favor of this “negative energy” as described by John Bedini in the “Energy From the Vacuum” educational series of DVDs.! This is the third of 5 final charging/discharging cycles. The battery took only 14 hours and 25 minutes to charge way past my 14.5 volt target—ending at 15.87 volts! WAY less time than any prior cycles. The discharge portion of the cycle seems to remain the same regardless of the fact that it now takes less than 75% of the time that it used to take in order to fully charge the battery. This is further evidence supporting John Bedini's hypothesis that the batteries, while under the influence of one of these systems, take on “conditioning” favorable to the utilization of external environmental negative energy, or vacuum energy. Are the plates and electrolyte taking on negative space/time properties, creating an environment conducive to an increased in-flow of energy from the Dirac sea, as this might suggest??? All of this would make little sense to one thoroughly indoctrinated into standard electrical theory (thank God I have only 12 volt automotive experience). SWEET! This is the second to the last charging/discharging cycle run. Wow! I was expecting the system to charge up quickly past 14.5 volts again. However, the battery seems to have stopped charging at 14.3 volts, The system has been running for an hour-hour and a half at that level, with no change. I am going to assume that this is the new “full” for the battery, and am now shutting the system down to rest the battery. Hmmm...another accidental observation. I went to shut the motor down, but before doing so, I moved the large fan away from where I had placed it. I had put the fan near the circuit about an hour and a half ago. Suddenly, the battery started charging again! Go figure! Did the electromagnetic field of the tall axial rotation room fan interfere with the SSG's circuit resonance???. I will let the battery charge up to the target 14.5 volts (assuming it continues to charge).OK...the battery charge only went up to 14.35 volts, and held there for another half hour. I am now disconnecting the motor and letting the battery rest. The system has been running for almost 20 hours at this point. This is the final charging/discharging cycle. I slept through my alarm and let the energizer run for almost 22 hours. The charge voltage ended up at 15.36 volts. After resting for a couple hours, the voltage settled at 13.13 volts—one of the highest resting voltages this battery has had. Usually the output voltage lasts longer with this battery when the resting voltage is slightly higher. I am interested in how long it takes to bring the voltage down to 12.25, or so, this final discharge cycle. My hypothesis was correct. It took much longer for the battery to discharge with the resting voltage (.07 volts higher, 9.5 hours vs 8-8.5 hours).

What I Have Learned.

Well, the most important “thing” I learned is to not jump to conclusions when one finds anomalous situations in regard to this technology. Take a breath, walk away, check the condition of the batteries in one's test equipment, make sure they are hooked up correctly, repeat the process, and see whether the anomaly is repeated. Most of the time, and anomaly was due to equipment, rather than the project. Other than that, as the experiment went forward, it became obvious that something other than standard electricity was charging the battery...or rather “changing” the battery. It required less input to produce the same or more output. With my automotive electrical background, one would expect the opposite to occur. In an ongoing, but ever so slight way, a battery (in a “normal” electrical system) would deteriorate , in regard to its ability to charge and discharge. The fact that it takes considerably less amp/hours, or joules, to charge up, compared to the amount of amp/hours, or joules, of capacity it has to do work, shows that the battery is getting that “extra” energy from somewhere else. This factor, along with a second factor...where the battery seemed to improve over time, and not deteriorate...makes for an excellent example of what John Bedini describes as “conditioning,” where the battery takes on characteristics more conducive toward utilizing “environmental” energy from the Dirac sea, or the vacuum. This has been an awesome learning experience. .

[James_Somewhere_In_Idaho]

My completed 20 runs &quot;spreadsheet&quot;

Following is a zip file of the data from my 20 required runs:

[John_Koorn]

Hi James,

That's a pretty good report, thanks for posting it. There is undeniable proof that when you build it right, it works!

No problem with letting the charge battery go above 14.5v, in fact that is where most of the desulfation occurs. What you reported is perfectly normal for this technology, when you saw the voltage jump around a bit it is because as the sulfation is broken down, the battery's impedance changes and so does the voltage change as well.


John K.

[James_Somewhere_In_Idaho]

Thank you John...it was an awesome experience!

So what's next? I would seriously like to build something big...similar to J.B.'s 10 coiler...or at least something that could grow into something bigger (I have certain goals I must stick by). I do have questions about how to get the biggest bang for one's buck in regard to wire size, and the frugal use of transistors (heavy duty ones powering more than one coil strand, like 3 transistors, powering a 6 wire coil with a trigger, etc) for my next build.

James

[John_Koorn]

Hi James,

I would recommend you wind a multi-strand coil and build a multi-transistor circuit. You can still use the same frame and rotor. A good place to start would be a 5-filar coil 125' of AWG#18. 1 strand is used for the trigger and the other 4 each go to a single transistor.


John K.

[James_Somewhere_In_Idaho]

Hi John

That sounds good. Plus, I will be working on designing an expandable multi-coil-multi-rotor unit, per my long term goals. I can probably use the TV degauss coils I have salvaged for the multi-filer, but will be using fresh magnet wire for the bigger project...sound good to you??? Questions: I take it that it isn't in good form to put two or more coil strands on one transistor...am I correct? Or, is that something one can consider? And, if so, would I be correct in assuming one would see a greater chance of a transistor failing if they did such a thing?

James

[ben_says]

fantastic spreadsheet. thank you for sharing it.