Tweet
Just this past Christmas I stumbled onto the energizers John and the forum on yahoo groups. Since then I have been hell bent on building and testing them. I was looking around on Tom Bearden’s web site and did not know there was even a SSG experiment going on. So I checked it out and built one and then another.
The rest is as follows:
Two Charging Experiments have been done simultaneously and the following test data is as follows:
Vanilla SSG with 16 magnets will be designated as Linear or “L”.
Modified SSG with 16 Magnets nonlinear spacing will be designated as nonlinear or “NL”.
Two new lead acid batteries of the same type and size were purchased off the internet for these experiments. They are #12N5-3B 5ah - 12 volts flooded named Adventure Power from China. Spade connectors were bolted to the leads for quick connections.
The battery load discharge devise for both batteries was two 25 ohm resistors 2 watt soldered in series to provide a .25 amp load for discharging. The resistors had leads soldered on with spade connectors attached.
Both energizers were run from the exact same battery bank during the duration of the charging process.
Magnets = ferrite type 1.875 X .875 X .375
At this juncture I will go into the details of each charging unit.
SSG “NL” Non Linear unit
25” aluminum bicycle wheel with steel spokes. 16 magnets were attached to the rim with black tape and then wrapped outside in circumference with reinforced fiberglass tape 1.875 wide two layers.
Free wheel time setup for 9-9.5 minutes.
Plastic Spool for winding was purchased from r-charge…. .937” hub dia. 3.03” hub width…core id .770” filled with .061” dia. mild steel tig-welding rod.
Coil = bifilar wound from my own winding ….. trigger coil 11.3 ohms .016” dia. Copper wire…… power coil 5.7 ohms .027” Copper wire Number of windings of each wire is 852 turns.
Electronic parts from Kit from r-charge using the MJL21194 transistor.
Tuning 445 ohm resistor mounted on board for .22 amp draw from primary battery and the energizer output was .07 amp @ approx. 145 RPM~.
Yes there was a balancing issue I solved with some 304 stainless bars I had laying around.
Supporting structure for the wheel was 304 SS channel .058 thick with feet welded one and the other slotted for the wheel mount axle.
Magnet spacing 16 pieces 7.7”, 5”, 4.6” 4.1” 3.9” 3.4” 3.2” 2.8” 2.4” 2.8” 3.2” 3.9” 4.1” 4.6” 5”
Both primary and charging leads the same length.
SSG “L” Linear unit
25” aluminum bicycle wheel with steel spokes. 16 magnets were attached to the rim with black tape and then wrapped outside in circumference with reinforced fiberglass tape 1.875 wide two layers.
Free wheel time setup for 9-9.5 minutes.
Plastic Spool for winding was purchased from r-charge…. .937” hub dia. 3.03” hub width…core id .770” filled with .061” dia. mild steel tig-welding rod.
Coil = bifilar wound from my own winding ….. trigger coil 11.4 ohms .016” dia. Copper wire…… power coil 5.8 ohms .027” Copper wire Number of windings of each wire is 852 turns.
Electronic parts MJL21194 transistor.
Tuning 370 ohm resistor mounted on board for .24 amp draw from primary battery and the energizer output was .07 amp @ approx. 160 rpm~.
Supporting structure for the wheel was 304 SS channel .058 thick with feet welded one and the other slotted for the wheel mount axle.
Magnet spacing 16 pieces equally spaced on the OD of rim.
Both primary and charging leads the same length.
Everything about these two units are completely identical except for the fact that the magnet spacing is different on the nonlinear unit.
Run Data for both batteries.
Both SSG units were run from the same 12 volt battery bank at the same time …..they shared the same barttery bank.
Concluding evidence after 50 plus runs on both batteries.
I was told many months ago on the forum that doing the nonlinear test was a waste of my time. I now think that this data might change his mind! It surely made a believer out of me. The attached file shows detailed data on the charging differences.
Early on I had a suspicion that the nonlinear magnet spacing had the charging advantage of charging the battery faster than the linearly space energizer. After the first 15 runs it was evident that something was wrong as I could not get the batteries fully charged. The tuning was wrong! This was corrected.
The second set of 20 runs was completed wrong on my part by being stupid and not reading all of the requirements for the testing data. This is where I stumbled onto the fact that the original coil from r-charge was not built to the 850 turn spec. It was more like 1100-1200 turns. This led me to rewind another coil so that both energizers on test would have the exact same number of 852 turns using the exact same wire on both coils.
The 3rd set of run data is now very compelling! 20 runs have now been completed on each of the linear and nonlinear energizers. The data now shows that the nonlinear unit charges quicker, uses less current, and gets the charging done faster @ a slower RPM than the linear unit.
I attended the conference several weeks ago in June and talked very explicitly with Peter Lindeman about this very topic and he is very interested in receiving the test data.
Can anyone give me his e-mail address to make sure it gets into his hands.
There are some other changes I made along the way to both SSG’s that not many have figured out or are willing to discuss. I had a hell of a time getting the batteries above 14 volts. The charging seemed to just stall. So I did some experimentation that I noticed on John’s videos. The first one was to shift the South Pole away from the midpoint between the north poles…..make the South Pole off center like John showed in one of his DVD’s. Howard Johnson thank you. I put a small neo piece on the edge of the standard magnets and in deed the South Pole did shift. So I did it to all of the magnets both NL and L. With this setup the wheels would not start normally with a small spin. I found out that I had to get the wheel s up to speed of around 180 rpm and then they would run fine. I also found out that a massive charge gain was realized by reducing the magnet to coil spacing to around 1/32 inch. Now this solved the charging issue above 14 volts. I then reached another plateau at 14.48v. So once again I went back to the DVD’s by john and remembered the coil confined by saw dust “steel” and put some ¾ inch cast iron elbows around the coils near the bottom away from the magnets. The intensity of the charge from this point was fantastic. There is something about having iron around these coils. All of these modifications solve all of my charging issues. They are not big but they do work.
Oh one more thing…….there are talkers and doers. I am one of the doers and never give up trying, modifying, or figure out why. I have been buried in this research over the past few months and I am not done yet. My next objective is to build a 48” SSG out of 2” thick aluminum. The super pole magnets will be 2” X 3” arranged in a nonlinear fashion on each 180 degree section of the wheel thus eliminating the balancing issue. I am considering mounting 3 coils every 15 degrees of the periphery for a total of 72 coils. One on the edge and one on each side of the wheel. What I do not know is how many strands to wind on the multistrand twisted coils. Also I do not know how long each strand has to be to geared for 48 volts. I have already built the 8 strand coil and circuitry and it works fantastic along with the ssg. Any help from the group would be appreciated.
I did attend the conference in June and I support Paul Babcock and Ron Hatton for their work and their efforts. I have recently been working with Ron about getting him the equipment to continue his endeavor and have also sent him an undisclosed monetary donation to keep his dream alive. If it were not for folks doing the right thing none of this work will continue. I am trying like hell to keep this free energy thing alive and well.
My deepest appreciation goes out to John B ……a man who asks nothing but yet offers the keys to change history in the evolving energy revolution. Thank you John!
Forrest Mohrman 8/7/2012
Tom Bearden might just be right. We might someday run a battle ship on 2 D cell batteries.
The rest is as follows:
Two Charging Experiments have been done simultaneously and the following test data is as follows:
Vanilla SSG with 16 magnets will be designated as Linear or “L”.
Modified SSG with 16 Magnets nonlinear spacing will be designated as nonlinear or “NL”.
Two new lead acid batteries of the same type and size were purchased off the internet for these experiments. They are #12N5-3B 5ah - 12 volts flooded named Adventure Power from China. Spade connectors were bolted to the leads for quick connections.
The battery load discharge devise for both batteries was two 25 ohm resistors 2 watt soldered in series to provide a .25 amp load for discharging. The resistors had leads soldered on with spade connectors attached.
Both energizers were run from the exact same battery bank during the duration of the charging process.
Magnets = ferrite type 1.875 X .875 X .375
At this juncture I will go into the details of each charging unit.
SSG “NL” Non Linear unit
25” aluminum bicycle wheel with steel spokes. 16 magnets were attached to the rim with black tape and then wrapped outside in circumference with reinforced fiberglass tape 1.875 wide two layers.
Free wheel time setup for 9-9.5 minutes.
Plastic Spool for winding was purchased from r-charge…. .937” hub dia. 3.03” hub width…core id .770” filled with .061” dia. mild steel tig-welding rod.
Coil = bifilar wound from my own winding ….. trigger coil 11.3 ohms .016” dia. Copper wire…… power coil 5.7 ohms .027” Copper wire Number of windings of each wire is 852 turns.
Electronic parts from Kit from r-charge using the MJL21194 transistor.
Tuning 445 ohm resistor mounted on board for .22 amp draw from primary battery and the energizer output was .07 amp @ approx. 145 RPM~.
Yes there was a balancing issue I solved with some 304 stainless bars I had laying around.
Supporting structure for the wheel was 304 SS channel .058 thick with feet welded one and the other slotted for the wheel mount axle.
Magnet spacing 16 pieces 7.7”, 5”, 4.6” 4.1” 3.9” 3.4” 3.2” 2.8” 2.4” 2.8” 3.2” 3.9” 4.1” 4.6” 5”
Both primary and charging leads the same length.
SSG “L” Linear unit
25” aluminum bicycle wheel with steel spokes. 16 magnets were attached to the rim with black tape and then wrapped outside in circumference with reinforced fiberglass tape 1.875 wide two layers.
Free wheel time setup for 9-9.5 minutes.
Plastic Spool for winding was purchased from r-charge…. .937” hub dia. 3.03” hub width…core id .770” filled with .061” dia. mild steel tig-welding rod.
Coil = bifilar wound from my own winding ….. trigger coil 11.4 ohms .016” dia. Copper wire…… power coil 5.8 ohms .027” Copper wire Number of windings of each wire is 852 turns.
Electronic parts MJL21194 transistor.
Tuning 370 ohm resistor mounted on board for .24 amp draw from primary battery and the energizer output was .07 amp @ approx. 160 rpm~.
Supporting structure for the wheel was 304 SS channel .058 thick with feet welded one and the other slotted for the wheel mount axle.
Magnet spacing 16 pieces equally spaced on the OD of rim.
Both primary and charging leads the same length.
Everything about these two units are completely identical except for the fact that the magnet spacing is different on the nonlinear unit.
Run Data for both batteries.
Both SSG units were run from the same 12 volt battery bank at the same time …..they shared the same barttery bank.
Concluding evidence after 50 plus runs on both batteries.
I was told many months ago on the forum that doing the nonlinear test was a waste of my time. I now think that this data might change his mind! It surely made a believer out of me. The attached file shows detailed data on the charging differences.
Early on I had a suspicion that the nonlinear magnet spacing had the charging advantage of charging the battery faster than the linearly space energizer. After the first 15 runs it was evident that something was wrong as I could not get the batteries fully charged. The tuning was wrong! This was corrected.
The second set of 20 runs was completed wrong on my part by being stupid and not reading all of the requirements for the testing data. This is where I stumbled onto the fact that the original coil from r-charge was not built to the 850 turn spec. It was more like 1100-1200 turns. This led me to rewind another coil so that both energizers on test would have the exact same number of 852 turns using the exact same wire on both coils.
The 3rd set of run data is now very compelling! 20 runs have now been completed on each of the linear and nonlinear energizers. The data now shows that the nonlinear unit charges quicker, uses less current, and gets the charging done faster @ a slower RPM than the linear unit.
I attended the conference several weeks ago in June and talked very explicitly with Peter Lindeman about this very topic and he is very interested in receiving the test data.
Can anyone give me his e-mail address to make sure it gets into his hands.
There are some other changes I made along the way to both SSG’s that not many have figured out or are willing to discuss. I had a hell of a time getting the batteries above 14 volts. The charging seemed to just stall. So I did some experimentation that I noticed on John’s videos. The first one was to shift the South Pole away from the midpoint between the north poles…..make the South Pole off center like John showed in one of his DVD’s. Howard Johnson thank you. I put a small neo piece on the edge of the standard magnets and in deed the South Pole did shift. So I did it to all of the magnets both NL and L. With this setup the wheels would not start normally with a small spin. I found out that I had to get the wheel s up to speed of around 180 rpm and then they would run fine. I also found out that a massive charge gain was realized by reducing the magnet to coil spacing to around 1/32 inch. Now this solved the charging issue above 14 volts. I then reached another plateau at 14.48v. So once again I went back to the DVD’s by john and remembered the coil confined by saw dust “steel” and put some ¾ inch cast iron elbows around the coils near the bottom away from the magnets. The intensity of the charge from this point was fantastic. There is something about having iron around these coils. All of these modifications solve all of my charging issues. They are not big but they do work.
Oh one more thing…….there are talkers and doers. I am one of the doers and never give up trying, modifying, or figure out why. I have been buried in this research over the past few months and I am not done yet. My next objective is to build a 48” SSG out of 2” thick aluminum. The super pole magnets will be 2” X 3” arranged in a nonlinear fashion on each 180 degree section of the wheel thus eliminating the balancing issue. I am considering mounting 3 coils every 15 degrees of the periphery for a total of 72 coils. One on the edge and one on each side of the wheel. What I do not know is how many strands to wind on the multistrand twisted coils. Also I do not know how long each strand has to be to geared for 48 volts. I have already built the 8 strand coil and circuitry and it works fantastic along with the ssg. Any help from the group would be appreciated.
I did attend the conference in June and I support Paul Babcock and Ron Hatton for their work and their efforts. I have recently been working with Ron about getting him the equipment to continue his endeavor and have also sent him an undisclosed monetary donation to keep his dream alive. If it were not for folks doing the right thing none of this work will continue. I am trying like hell to keep this free energy thing alive and well.
My deepest appreciation goes out to John B ……a man who asks nothing but yet offers the keys to change history in the evolving energy revolution. Thank you John!
Forrest Mohrman 8/7/2012
Tom Bearden might just be right. We might someday run a battle ship on 2 D cell batteries.
have a nice build
Comment