Hi All,
My response will have a bit longer intervals in the upcoming weeks since I just picked up another contract job, but I’m still on top of this topic/think about it a lot. But maybe that’s a good thing for Gary and RS, not receiving a full page with questions every second day hahaha.
@RS_ hope you feel better soon/overcome the infection.
@Gary, many thanks for your input.
Output battery
1.1 When you speak about the “the positive peak of the spike”, I assume you mean the spike as I indicated them in the attachment?
1.2 The peaks of the blue trace only show one big spike (the radiant event) “p1”* and then a couple of very tiny ones. But all on one side of the battery level (so not changing polarity, just changing in amplitude).
If I look at the yellow trace from your sniffer coil, in see that the peaks are reducing very gradually and do change polarity.
So is it correct to state that the yellow sniffer coil trace is only an effect of peak “p1”? (And not following/having a direct relation with the other/smaller peaks of the blue trace).
1.3 Assuming 1.2 is correct: Why does the sniffer coil trace change polarity and why/what is actually happening here?**
Input battery
2.1 When you speak about the “and the negative peak of the spike hammers the primary”, do you mean the spike “p2”*?
2.2 If 2.1 is correct, and if we call peak p1 the radiant event (moment X from my previous post), then the spike to the input battery does take place after it, as peak p2 happens after p1. (Instead of them taking place at the same time). Correct?
2.2 As stated in 1.2 the “negative” spike p2 doesn’t change polarity, and therefore I’m struggling with understanding how this “negative” spike spikes to the input battery. What I mean with this is that I’m in my head with your example of the lightning; so as long as the blue trace doesn’t change polarity, the biggest “pressure” difference would still be with the positive pole of the output battery…
However, you mentioned a couple of times already that I think too much in a “regular” electrical point view. Your statement is back-uped by the fact that the primary battery has no ground connection when the spikes are happening (and also by ref 1 from my post #258, “back to the positive terminal…along one wire”).
But if I can’t look at it from a perspective of potential/pressure differences, than that brings be back to square one: how does the spike “chooses” to either go to the input or output battery…
You mentioned that RS may have some input on this too. Looking forward to his response also when he feels a bit better.
*see attachment
**If I look on pages 17/21/23 in the book “Free Energy Generation”, I see images/explanation of the ringing as well, also from that it didn’t became particularly clear to me .
Thanks again,
best regards,
Rodolphe
2020-07-05 attachment.pdf
My response will have a bit longer intervals in the upcoming weeks since I just picked up another contract job, but I’m still on top of this topic/think about it a lot. But maybe that’s a good thing for Gary and RS, not receiving a full page with questions every second day hahaha.
@RS_ hope you feel better soon/overcome the infection.
@Gary, many thanks for your input.
Output battery
1.1 When you speak about the “the positive peak of the spike”, I assume you mean the spike as I indicated them in the attachment?
1.2 The peaks of the blue trace only show one big spike (the radiant event) “p1”* and then a couple of very tiny ones. But all on one side of the battery level (so not changing polarity, just changing in amplitude).
If I look at the yellow trace from your sniffer coil, in see that the peaks are reducing very gradually and do change polarity.
So is it correct to state that the yellow sniffer coil trace is only an effect of peak “p1”? (And not following/having a direct relation with the other/smaller peaks of the blue trace).
1.3 Assuming 1.2 is correct: Why does the sniffer coil trace change polarity and why/what is actually happening here?**
Input battery
2.1 When you speak about the “and the negative peak of the spike hammers the primary”, do you mean the spike “p2”*?
2.2 If 2.1 is correct, and if we call peak p1 the radiant event (moment X from my previous post), then the spike to the input battery does take place after it, as peak p2 happens after p1. (Instead of them taking place at the same time). Correct?
2.2 As stated in 1.2 the “negative” spike p2 doesn’t change polarity, and therefore I’m struggling with understanding how this “negative” spike spikes to the input battery. What I mean with this is that I’m in my head with your example of the lightning; so as long as the blue trace doesn’t change polarity, the biggest “pressure” difference would still be with the positive pole of the output battery…
However, you mentioned a couple of times already that I think too much in a “regular” electrical point view. Your statement is back-uped by the fact that the primary battery has no ground connection when the spikes are happening (and also by ref 1 from my post #258, “back to the positive terminal…along one wire”).
But if I can’t look at it from a perspective of potential/pressure differences, than that brings be back to square one: how does the spike “chooses” to either go to the input or output battery…
You mentioned that RS may have some input on this too. Looking forward to his response also when he feels a bit better.
*see attachment
**If I look on pages 17/21/23 in the book “Free Energy Generation”, I see images/explanation of the ringing as well, also from that it didn’t became particularly clear to me .
Thanks again,
best regards,
Rodolphe
2020-07-05 attachment.pdf
Comment