Stan Meyer - The Nitrogen Key

[Willem Coetzee]

Hi Mike,

Mine just runs on propane and that's it.

What I don't show in that is that I have an exhaust recycler. I pull a lever and the thrust diverts to a big water bong that boils water - steam output goes back to turbine impeller. For x pounds of propane in the tank, I can get it to idle on less than 1psi instead of 8 psi (when recycling exhaust through water).

I have all the radio circuits needed to heterodyne an area between some antennas - I couldn't get the antennas built good enough. Exhaust that gets recycled through water - that is what needs to go through an ABS tube with the antennas. The heterodyning will create the fuel - some n2o, nh3, etc. the only source of nitrogen to do this is from the ambient air.

I believe you can do this Aaron! Is heterodyn in the same family as hydrazine - N2H4 and N2H5, etc.? (I could have googled itm but I do not believe "rabbi wiki" that much, since they also got Stan's tech 100% wrong.

[Willem Coetzee]

Sorry guys, my previous post makes no sense!

To me it looks like Aaron is developing new heterodyning techniques to manipulate the atomic-level chemistry to artificially form desired components.

Atomic chemistry is about electric balances, timing, and control, isn't it?

The common man has no screwdrivers and pliers we can stick in there and "tune" things to our song - why can't heterodyne tech be one of tools available to actually accomplish it?

Tesla aether-power towers were bought, stripped and sold for scrap before the masses could benefit, but thousands of people have seen things lit, whirring, heating, etc, with there own eyes... not powered by the grid or other fuels.

Searl had tech in real demo filmed flying under remote control and picked up on radar... seen by many of the public... no hydrocarbon other other fuels, or even indirect grid dependencies...

Many witnessed Stan's machines and buggy running not on any liquid fuels, other than created by itself on the go...

If oxygen from air as a mono-propellant is ones fancy - hey great!

IF carbon can be abandoned in favor of a complete nitrogen replacement - hey great!

RIGHT NOW - as I write this - 99% or what ever unacceptable amount of internal combustion engines are still running on hydrocarbon fuels.

Other technologies historically to the contrary all of a sudden are VERY QUIETLY and VERY FAST infiltrating the market, riding the gravy train put there by the VACUUM of tech discussed on this forum.

Just look at one "simple" little detail for instance:

NH3 as fuel by itself only produce about HALF the energy output than gasoline - N2O is added to gasoline and it outperforms the normal gasoline by far... where does it leave "hho" and "nh3"??

The answer lies, like Aaron explains in this threat, is in Stan's tech regarding CONTROL of this fuel constituents. To get THERE takes time to TUNE all the parameters until a successful synchronicity is reach providing the desired synergy.

To the doubtful out there, I advise to go look up the main nitrogen chemistry and ALL its compound branches.

Stan was NOT wrong - neither is Aaron, and nor anybody else that would dare to venture along these lines.

My pastor has got some Stan-tech in a private state of tune going for him allowing his and two other cars to run on full power - not substituting any existing fuel, with normal fuel-tank lines OFF the engines - it is ONLY the artificial water-fuel created on demand with air, water and electricity (and no, the electrical systems are NOT over-burdened), thank you to Stan and people like Aaron who seek the truth.

I say no more on this subject... LOOK into the truth Aaron shares here - read the Water Fuel Secrets report !

Thank you Aaron!!!

[Faraday88]

Hi everyone,

I'm starting this thread first to lay out in Stan Meyer's own words what his process is and how nitrogen is the key to making his water fuel.

If you believe contrary - DO NOT POST HERE - go start another thread and discuss resonant circuits, etc... this thread is to explain the very key that makes a real fuel that can be used in an engine.

So many people are fixated on the water cells, but only a very small handful of people are paying attention to his earlier work that reveals his secret.

First of all, this all comes down to burning the water gas. But as most of us know, a "HHO" gas from a common ducted water cell will just give you a quick pop and you cannot sustain a flame. I'm not talking about a pressurized Brown's Gas torch flame, I'm talking about a slower and cooler burning flame that allows you to get the thermal energy from the water fuel. Stan Meyer was very, very clear about this throughout his work over the entire course of time that he was involved in this research and development.

He said that to control the burn rate of the water fuel, you have to mix non-combustible gases with it. That includes non-combustible gases from 1) the water has 17%+ dissolved gases according to him, 2) from the ambient air going into the intake, and 3) from the exhaust gases recycling back to mix with the water gas - of course that exhaust gas will contain non-combustible gases from sources 1 & 2.

I had a special interest in nitrogen from some other technologies so that was in the back of my mind as being a possibility and that dealt mostly with allotropic or active nitrogen. That is essentially ionized nitrogen atoms that are heavily positively charged. It was brought to my attention a few years ago that NITROGEN was the non-combustible gas that Meyer was talking about specifically. The nitrogen alarm went off, I re-looked at Stan Meyer's work, and there it was plain as day - NITROGEN indeed IS the non-combustible gas that Meyer was referring to. It certainly wasn't the 1% trace gases that some "experts" are claiming.

When plain HHO is ignited, it detonates instead of actually giving any real thermal combustion. The atoms and molecules just combine instantly to form a water molecule and there was a shrinkage in the volume that the gasses occupied. HHO is a mixture of about a dozen hydrogen based molecules and atoms and oxygen based molecules and atoms. It is not just a re-arranged water molecule. It works wonders as a torch flame and as a fuel supplement, but for fuel supplementation, the real benefit is coming form the reactive oxygen molecules stripping electrons from the hydrocarbon molecules breaking them into smaller pieces. That give you more BTU's our of the same amount of fuel that was put into the combustion chamber. This is the model that makes sense to me anyway and in any case, it is not the exact subject of this thread.

The water is always touted as being such a wonderful byproduct - BUT, what if... that is actually what robs you of the energy that is lying right there in the hydrogen and you only get a little teaser from it.

With electrolysis, nitrogen gases in the water also split to create atomic nitrogen. Nitrogen is normally very difficult to split and it has a triple electron bond - the strongest normal bond in nature. But when you do strip those electrons away, you can have a nitrogen atom that is +3 charge - it is a very strong vacuum cleaner for anything negatively charged such as some of the HHO molecules and atoms that happen to be negatively charged. Things seem to happen easier when done in water or with water. Sir Humphrey Davy said in 1807 that electrolytic hydrogen will bind with nitrogen in the presence of water when normal hydrogen will not!

Now when we dilute the HHO gases with nitrogen, much of this nitrogen is ionized through the combustion and electrolysis processes. When there is atomic nitrogen, the hydrogen can attach to it creating traces of ammonia (NH3), some oxygen can bond creating traces of nitrous oxide (N2O) and other molecules. Each molecule of this is one less water molecule that forms and you were able to get more thermal energy out of the same amount of water gas that if you didn't have the nitrogen dilution. This allows the water fuel (with nitrogen) to burn slower and cooler - you get the thermal energy out of it - real combustion and not a quick Brown's Gas pop.

The slow burning flames from water are the foundation of Stan Meyer's work - this is his logo. It all started with this. That is not Brown's Gas torch flames rising from the water, those are slow burning "candle flames", which is what you want for a sole fuel for an engine and not just a supplement. It's been in front of everybody's eyes since the beginning. As the only fuel, and to get enough combustion so that the engine can give enough power to turn a generator to create enough electricity to make enough fuel, this process is what is required according to Stan Meyer. This idea is embodied in every single part of his work with water fuel.


(Stan Meyer's Logo)

Stanley Meyer says word for word: "the velocity of hydrogen is so great that the hydrogen ensuing from a nozzle will not under ordinary circumstances sustain a flame. Therefore, to sustain a flame at a nozzle attached to a hydrogen generator the burning velocity of the hydrogen gas must be reduced. "

This is where it starts when it comes to understanding what Stan Meyer was up to - "...the burning velocity of the hydrogen gas must be reduced."

• and other non-volatile gasses such as oxygen and nitrogen. The hydrogen gas with the attendant non-volatile gasses in a controlled ratio are fed via a line to a controlled air intake system. The combined hydrogen, non-volatile gasses, and the air after intermixing are fed to a combustion chamber wherein the mixture is ignited. The exhaust gasses of the combustion chamber are returned in a closed loop arrangement to the mixing chamber for the mixture of volatile as the non-combustible gasses.
• [0006] More specifically, the generated hydrogen gas is fed to a gas mixing chamber, wherein the hydrogen gas is inter- mixed with non-combustible gasses. The mixture is fed to a carburator (air intake mixture) system.
• [0007] The gas mixture is'fed through nozzle to chamber in a jet spray. Valve or gate controls the amount of air intake to the jet spray. The gasses combine with the air to form a gas mixture of hydrogen, non-volatile gas, and oxygen. The mixture now combustible, but not volatile, is entered into a combustion chamber"

Meyer defines non-volatile NITROGEN as a non-volatile gas.

He also defines the non-volatile gases as being synonymous with using the term non-combustible gases.

The gases combine with AIR to form a gas mixture of hydrogen, non-volatile gas (NITROGEN) and oxygen. The mixture now combustible, but NOT VOLATILE, is not entered into the combustion chamber.

Plain water gas from the cell is EXTREMELY VOLATILE. That is just the way the so-called HHO gas is. It becomes NON-VOLATILE by blending it with NITROGEN! And THAT is the key to how he ran an engine on water, air and electricity. He wasn't making big amounts of gas. He started off with common flat plated electrolysis cells with pulsed DC. No VIC and all the resonance business. That all came after and is NOT foundational to the real foundation of Stan Meyer's technology. the real foundation is a simple pulsed dc electrolysis cell gas production is diluted with NITROGEN. Without the nitrogen, the water gas is very volatile and is not in the preferred combustible state that is needed for an engine. And you can take a look at adding a magnetic coil around the pipes as well as applying a vacuum to the cell, but this is the basic concept.

Look at this nozzle...





You can see the HHO from the bottom blends with ambient air and then it gets burned. The exhaust from the flame goes to the environment and some is recaptured to go dilute the hho and ambient air mix to be reburned.

Hi Aaron,
Without departing from the gist of this Thread,a quick thought about his demonstration unit spurs in My mind as i read your discription on the need of Nitrogen Gas and its proportion to slow down the burn rate of Hydro-Oxy Gas.
Yes,i'm refering to the Flame melting a Stainless Steel wire, straight from the nozzle of his Demonstration (9 cell Tubular array), This Flame is a sustained Cool Flame until it touches the Stainless Steel wire, instantly melting it, do you think the dissolved Nitrogen gas in the Tap water used is readily attributing to the slowed down Burn rate? just curious on this..
Rgds,
Faraday88.

[David VonOhlerking]

Hi Aaron,
Without departing from the gist of this Thread,a quick thought about his demonstration unit spurs in My mind as i read your discription on the need of Nitrogen Gas and its proportion to slow down the burn rate of Hydro-Oxy Gas.
Yes,i'm refering to the Flame melting a Stainless Steel wire, straight from the nozzle of his Demonstration (9 cell Tubular array), This Flame is a sustained Cool Flame until it touches the Stainless Steel wire, instantly melting it, do you think the dissolved Nitrogen gas in the Tap water used is readily attributing to the slowed down Burn rate? just curious on this..
Rgds,
Faraday88.

This is the exact thing i was wondering about. I am messing around with this stuff right now, so if i find anything, i will post it here.
I havent messed with tap water for a while, because while giving a simple demo to a friend, the water quickly turned green, then brown, and we both started caughing, and tearing up. I will probably just use rain water, and post the results here. If anyone knows a good dimension for a flash tube, let me know. (i might just use a long vinyl tube)

This is my first post here, so if I am doing anything wrong, please let me know. C:
-David v

[Aaron Murakami]

Hi Aaron,
Without departing from the gist of this Thread,a quick thought about his demonstration unit spurs in My mind as i read your discription on the need of Nitrogen Gas and its proportion to slow down the burn rate of Hydro-Oxy Gas.
Yes,i'm refering to the Flame melting a Stainless Steel wire, straight from the nozzle of his Demonstration (9 cell Tubular array), This Flame is a sustained Cool Flame until it touches the Stainless Steel wire, instantly melting it, do you think the dissolved Nitrogen gas in the Tap water used is readily attributing to the slowed down Burn rate? just curious on this..
Rgds,
Faraday88.

First time I saw this post.

Stan quotes a lot of nitrogen gas in tap water, but he is way overstating what is really there.

There is very little nitrogen in tap water - most is coming from the intake air.

[Aaron Murakami]

This is the exact thing i was wondering about. I am messing around with this stuff right now, so if i find anything, i will post it here.
I havent messed with tap water for a while, because while giving a simple demo to a friend, the water quickly turned green, then brown, and we both started caughing, and tearing up. I will probably just use rain water, and post the results here. If anyone knows a good dimension for a flash tube, let me know. (i might just use a long vinyl tube)

This is my first post here, so if I am doing anything wrong, please let me know. C:
-David v

There are some back flash arrestor check valves that work ok and you can plug them into vinyl tube if that is what you mean.

Did you have some kind of fumes coming from the water?

I had water go brown then eventually, it actually went clear.

My negative tube got a white powder coating and the gas production was amazing.

https://youtu.be/VphxVYYnEvA?t=33s